Kharbanda Rohit K, van Schie Mathijs S, Taverne Yannick J H J, de Groot Natasja M S, Bogers Ad J J C
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
JTCVS Open. 2021 Mar 9;6:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.01.014. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Atrial extrasystoles are usually benign; however, they can also trigger atrial fibrillation. It is most likely that if atrial extrasystoles provoke a larger amount of conduction disorders and a greater degree of endo-epicardial asynchrony, the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation increases. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of programmed atrial extrasystoles on endo-epicardial conduction and postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Twelve patients (58% male, age 68 ± 7 years) underwent simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping (256 electrodes) of the right atrium during sinus rhythm and programmed atrial extrasystoles provoked from the right atrial free wall. Areas of conduction block were defined as conduction delays of ≥12 milliseconds and endo-epicardial asynchrony as activation time differences of exact opposite electrodes of ≥15 milliseconds.
Endo-epicardial mapping data of all programmed atrial extrasystoles were analyzed and compared with sinus rhythm (median preceding cycle length = 531 milliseconds [345-787] and median sinus rhythm cycle length = 843 milliseconds [701-992]). All programmed atrial extrasystoles were aberrant (severe, moderate, and mildly aberrant, respectively, n = 6, 3, and 3) and had a mean prematurity index of 50.1 ± 11.9%. The amount of endo-epicardial asynchrony (1% [1-2] vs 6.7 [2.7-16.9], = .006) and conduction block (1.4% [0.6-2.6] vs 8.5% [4.2-10.4], = .005) both increased during programmed atrial extrasystoles. Interestingly, conduction block during programmed atrial extrasystoles was more severe in patients (n = 4, 33.3%) who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation (5.1% [2.9-8.8] vs 11.3% [10.1-12.1], = .004).
Atrial conduction disorders and endo-epicardial asynchrony, which play an important role in arrhythmogenesis, are enhanced during programmed atrial extrasystoles compared with sinus rhythm. The findings of this pilot study provide a possible explanation for enhanced vulnerability for postoperative atrial extrasystoles to induce postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients after cardiac surgery.
房性期前收缩通常为良性;然而,它们也可引发心房颤动。如果房性期前收缩诱发大量传导障碍和更大程度的心内膜 - 心外膜不同步,那么术后发生心房颤动的风险很可能会增加。为验证这一假设,我们研究了程序性房性期前收缩对心内膜 - 心外膜传导及术后心房颤动的影响。
12例患者(男性占58%,年龄68±7岁)在窦性心律期间及从右心房游离壁诱发程序性房性期前收缩时,同时进行右心房的心内膜 - 心外膜标测(256电极)。传导阻滞区域定义为传导延迟≥12毫秒,心内膜 - 心外膜不同步定义为相对电极激活时间差≥15毫秒。
分析了所有程序性房性期前收缩的心内膜 - 心外膜标测数据,并与窦性心律(前一个周期长度中位数 = 531毫秒[345 - 787],窦性心律周期长度中位数 = 843毫秒[701 - 992])进行比较。所有程序性房性期前收缩均为异常(分别为严重、中度和轻度异常,n = 6、3和3),平均提前指数为50.1±11.9%。在程序性房性期前收缩期间,心内膜 - 心外膜不同步程度(1%[1 - 2]对6.7[2.7 - 16.9],P = 0.006)和传导阻滞程度(1.4%[0.6 - 2.6]对8.5%[4.2 - 10.4],P = 0.005)均增加。有趣的是,在发生术后心房颤动的患者(n = 4,33.3%)中,程序性房性期前收缩期间的传导阻滞更严重(5.1%[2.9 - 8.8]对11.3%[10.1 - 12.1],P = 0.004)。
与窦性心律相比,在程序性房性期前收缩期间,在心律失常发生中起重要作用的心房传导障碍和心内膜 - 心外膜不同步增强。这项初步研究的结果为心脏手术后患者房性期前收缩增强诱发术后心房颤动的易感性增加提供了一种可能的解释。