School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China.
School of Political Science and Public Administration, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 20;19(16):10370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610370.
Territorial space is a multi-functional complex. The coordinated production-living-ecological space (PLES) effectively coordinates the man-land relationship, promotes regional sustainable development, and maximizes territorial space. How to build a high-quality national spatial layout and support system for development has become a hot topic of concern in all sectors of society. However, few studies have explored the coupling coordination considering the various production-living-ecological functions of land use type and its influencing factors of PLES at the county scale in China. To address the gap, based on the connotation of PLES theory, this study established a classification and evaluation system for PLES and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics, coupling coordination degree, spatial autocorrelation, and influencing factors of PLES in China from 2000 to 2020. The results are as follows: (1) The production space index and living space index in China showed a continuous increase tendency, while the ecological space index decreased continuously during the study period. The production space and living space were concentrated in the east of Hu Line, and the ecological space indexes in mountainous areas were significantly higher than those in plain areas during the study period. (2) The gravity centers of PLES all migrated to the west of China to different degrees during the study period. (3) From 2000 to 2020, the basically balanced category was the main coupling coordination type, and the number of seriously unbalanced categories accounted for the least. In the west of the Hu Line, the seriously unbalanced category was dominant, while in the east of the Hu Line were the moderately unbalanced categories and above. (4) During the study period, the low-low type was the main relationship type, widely distributed in western China, followed by the high-high type, mainly situated in the North China Plain, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Jianghan Plain, Chengdu Plain, Northeast China Plain, and some provincial capital cities. (5) Regression results showed that natural factors were the main reason restricting the coordinated development of PLES, and socioeconomic factors could effectively promote the coordinated development of PLES. Landscape pattern also significantly influenced the coordinated development of PLES, but varied greatly. The findings of this study can provide a scientific reference for the optimization of territorial space layout and the promotion of high-quality development of territorial space.
地域空间是一个多功能的综合体。协调的生产-生活-生态空间(PLES)有效地协调了人地关系,促进了区域的可持续发展,最大限度地利用了地域空间。如何构建高质量的国家空间布局和发展支撑体系已成为社会各界关注的热点话题。然而,很少有研究从土地利用类型的各种生产-生活-生态功能角度出发,考虑到县尺度上的 PLES 耦合协调度及其影响因素。为了解决这一差距,基于 PLES 理论的内涵,本研究建立了 PLES 的分类评价体系,并分析了 2000 年至 2020 年中国 PLES 的时空特征、耦合协调度、空间自相关和影响因素。结果如下:(1)研究期间,中国的生产空间指数和生活空间指数呈持续增长趋势,而生态空间指数持续下降。生产空间和生活空间集中在胡焕庸线以东,研究期间山区的生态空间指数明显高于平原地区。(2)PLES 的重力中心在研究期间都不同程度地向西迁移。(3)从 2000 年到 2020 年,基本上平衡的类别是主要的耦合协调类型,严重不平衡的类别占比最少。胡焕庸线以西地区以严重不平衡类别为主,而胡焕庸线以东地区以中度不平衡类别及以上为主。(4)研究期间,低低类型是主要的关系类型,广泛分布在西部地区,其次是高高类型,主要分布在华北平原、长江三角洲、珠江三角洲、江汉平原、成都平原、东北平原和一些省会城市。(5)回归结果表明,自然因素是制约 PLES 协调发展的主要原因,而社会经济因素可以有效促进 PLES 的协调发展。景观格局也显著影响了 PLES 的协调发展,但差异较大。本研究的结果可为优化地域空间布局和促进地域空间高质量发展提供科学参考。