Rüber Fabienne, Wiederkehr Gilles, Steinack Carolin, Höller Sylvia, Bode Peter Karl, Kölbener Fabian, Franzen Daniel Peter
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Respiratory Unit, Hirslanden Clinic St. Anna, St. Anna-Strasse 32, 6006 Lucerne, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 11;11(16):4700. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164700.
When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (p < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique.
在评估纵隔/肺门淋巴结肿大(LAD)或肿块时,指南推荐将支气管内超声(EBUS)引导下经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)作为组织分析和诊断的初始技术。然而,由于针吸获得的样本量较小,其诊断率(DY)有限。EBUS经支气管钳取活检(TBFB)作为EBUS-TBNA的补充技术,可能有助于进行更好的组织病理学评估,从而提高诊断率。在这项回顾性双中心研究中,我们评估了与单独使用EBUS-TBNA相比,EBUS引导下1.5毫米微型钳取活检联合EBUS-TBNA诊断纵隔/肺门LAD或肿块的诊断率和安全性。总共纳入了105例患者。单独使用TBNA和EBUS-TBNA联合EBUS-TBFB的总体诊断率分别为61.9%和85.7%(p < 0.001)。虽然联合方法在肺癌诊断(97.1%对76.5%,p = 0.016)和结节病(85.2%对44.4%,p = 0.001)方面的诊断率显著更高,但对于样本量较小的亚组,如淋巴瘤,未计算出诊断率的显著差异。未观察到重大不良事件。与单独使用EBUS-TBNA作为一种独立技术相比,使用1.5毫米微型钳取活检是一种安全可行的技术,用于纵隔或肺门LAD或肿块的活检,总体诊断率更高。