• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过全州质量协作研究了解肺癌手术中的种族差异。

Understanding Racial Differences in Lung Cancer Surgery Through a Statewide Quality Collaborative.

作者信息

Bonner Sidra N, He Chang, Clark Melissa, Adams Kumari, Orelaru Felix, Popoff Andrew, Chang Andrew, Wakeam Elliot, Lagisetty Kiran

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):517-526. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12435-x. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-12435-x
PMID:36018516
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persistent racial disparities in lung cancer incidence, treatment, and survival are well documented. Given the importance of surgical resection for lung cancer treatment, racial disparities in surgical quality were investigated using a statewide quality collaborative.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from the Michigan Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons General Thoracic database, which includes data gathered for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database at 17 institutions in Michigan. Adult patients undergoing resection for lung cancer between 2015 and 2021 were included. Propensity score-weighting methodology was used to assess differences in surgical quality, including extent of resection, adequate lymph node evaluation, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rate between white and black patients.

RESULTS

The cohort included 5073 patients comprising 357 (7%) black and 4716 (93%) white patients. The black patients had significantly higher unadjusted rates of wedge resection than the white patients, but after propensity score-weighting for clinical factors, wedge resection did not differ from lobectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.49; P = 0.67). The black patients had fewer lymph nodes collected (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81; P < 0.0001) and lymph node stations sampled (IRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P < 0.0001). The black patients did not differ from the white patients in terms of mortality (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.19-2.34; P = 0.55) or readmission (OR, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.49-1.27; P = 0.32). The black patients had longer hospital stays (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In a statewide quality collaborative that included high-volume centers, black patients received a less extensive lymph node evaluation, with fewer non-anatomic wedge resections performed, and a more limited lymph node evaluation with lobectomy.

摘要

背景

肺癌发病率、治疗和生存率方面持续存在的种族差异已有充分记录。鉴于手术切除对肺癌治疗的重要性,我们利用全州质量协作组织对手术质量方面的种族差异进行了调查。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用了密歇根心胸外科医师协会普通胸科数据库中的数据,该数据库包含密歇根州17家机构为胸外科医师协会普通胸外科手术数据库收集的数据。纳入2015年至2021年间接受肺癌切除术的成年患者。采用倾向得分加权方法评估白人和黑人患者在手术质量方面的差异,包括切除范围、充分的淋巴结评估、30天死亡率和30天再入院率。

结果

该队列包括5073例患者,其中357例(7%)为黑人,4716例(93%)为白人。黑人患者楔形切除术的未调整率显著高于白人患者,但在对临床因素进行倾向得分加权后,楔形切除术与肺叶切除术无差异(优势比[OR],1.07;95%置信区间[CI],0.78 - 1.49;P = 0.67)。黑人患者收集的淋巴结较少(发病率比[IRR],0.77;95% CI,0.73 - 0.81;P < 0.0001),且采样的淋巴结站较少(IRR,0.89;95% CI,0.84 - 0.94;P < 0.0001)。黑人患者在死亡率(OR,0.65;95% CI,0.19 - 2.34;P = 0.55)或再入院率(OR,0.79;95% CI,0.49 - 1.27;P = 0.32)方面与白人患者无差异。黑人患者的住院时间更长(OR,1.08;95% CI,1.02 - 1.14;P = 0.01)。

结论

在一个包括大容量中心的全州质量协作组织中,黑人患者接受的淋巴结评估范围较小,非解剖性楔形切除术较少,肺叶切除术的淋巴结评估也更有限。

相似文献

1
Understanding Racial Differences in Lung Cancer Surgery Through a Statewide Quality Collaborative.通过全州质量协作研究了解肺癌手术中的种族差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):517-526. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12435-x. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Racial Disparities in the Surgical Treatment of Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Among Veterans.种族差异在退伍军人临床 I 期非小细胞肺癌的外科治疗中。
Chest. 2022 Oct;162(4):920-929. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.045. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Persistent racial disparities in refusal of resection in non-small cell lung cancer patients at high-volume and Black-serving institutions.在高容量和服务于黑人的机构中,非小细胞肺癌患者拒绝切除术的持续种族差异。
Surgery. 2023 Dec;174(6):1428-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
4
The influence of tobacco load versus smoking status on outcomes following lobectomy for lung cancer in a statewide quality collaborative.在全州质量协作中,烟草负荷与吸烟状况对肺癌肺叶切除术后结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1375-1385.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.162. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Do individual surgeon volumes affect outcomes in thoracic surgery?†.单个外科医生的手术量是否会影响胸外科手术的结果?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Oct 1;56(4):770-777. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz095.
6
Anatomic resection has superior long-term survival compared with wedge resection for second primary lung cancer after prior lobectomy.解剖性切除术与楔形切除术相比,在先前行肺叶切除术后治疗第二原发性肺癌具有更优的长期生存获益。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 8;59(5):1014-1020. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa443.
7
Oncologic and surgical outcomes for gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy differ by race in the United States.在美国,接受胃癌切除术的胃癌患者的肿瘤学和手术结果因种族而异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;46(10 Pt A):1941-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 16.
8
The Role of Extent of Surgical Resection and Lymph Node Assessment for Clinical Stage I Pulmonary Lepidic Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis of 1991 Patients.手术切除范围及淋巴结评估在临床Ⅰ期肺鳞屑样腺癌中的作用:1991例患者分析
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Apr;12(4):689-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
9
Intraoperative oncologic staging and outcomes for lung cancer resection vary by surgeon specialty.肺癌切除术的术中肿瘤分期和结果因外科医生专业而异。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;92(6):1958-63; discussion 1963-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.120. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Racial Differences in the Surgical Care of Medicare Beneficiaries With Localized Prostate Cancer.医疗保险受益人的局部前列腺癌手术治疗中的种族差异。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3384.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing barriers to care in the treatment of lung cancer: a narrative review.降低肺癌治疗中的就医障碍:一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):3410-3418. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-1962. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Equity and Opportunities in Lung Cancer Care-Addressing Disparities, Challenges, and Pathways Forward.肺癌护理中的公平性与机会——应对差异、挑战及未来路径
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;17(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081347.
3
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Lung Cancer Surgery Outcomes in the USA.美国肺癌手术结果中的种族/民族差异。
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;6(2):18. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia6020018.
4
National race and socioeconomic disparities in access to minimally invasive lung resection for early-stage lung cancer: Impact on mortality.早期肺癌患者在接受微创肺切除手术方面存在的国家种族和社会经济差异:对死亡率的影响。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Nov 19;23:358-368. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.035. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity after thoracic surgery in a large integrated health system.在一个大型综合医疗系统中,胸外科手术后不同种族/族裔的预后差异。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Apr 15;19:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Disparities in thoracic surgical oncology.胸外科肿瘤学中的差异。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb;127(2):329-335. doi: 10.1002/jso.27180.