Guthikonda Mohan Raghav, Gude Aswini, Naga Rahul
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 166 Military Hospital, Satwari Cantonment, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180003 India.
Department of Pathology, Gayatri Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, GVP Medical College, Maridi Valley, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530048 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):631-638. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02457-4. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
The aim of the study was to assess the role of mastoidectomy with type 1 tympanoplasty in the management of paediatric patients with poor contralateral ear status and to evaluate the prognostic factors that may influence the success outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty. A prospective study of 112 paediatric patients from 4 to 12 years of age. All patients in the study had bilateral ear perforations. They were randomly assigned to undergo either type 1 tympanoplasty (group 1, n = 56) or type 1 tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy (group 2, n = 56). The outcomes between the two groups were compared at 12 months postoperative period. The outcomes evaluated were: 1. anatomical condition of the tympanic membrane, 2. functional improvement in hearing (≥ 10 db), 3. air-filled middle ear space without atelectasis or otitis media with effusion, 4. overall outcome. The outcomes were also compared in both the surgical groups for patients who were ≤ 8 years (n = 51) and > 8 years (n = 61) of age. Prognostic factors for success outcome for type 1 tympanoplasty were evaluated. The prognostic factors considered were age at the time of surgery, age groups, duration of the disease prior to surgery, previous adenoidectomy, mechanism of perforation, location of perforation, size of the perforation, type of ear surgery performed (tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy). The success outcome in anatomical condition of the tympanic membrane was significantly higher in mastoidectomy group ( = 0.015) but was not significantly different in those ≤ 8 years and > 8 years ( = 0.112, = 0.064 respectively).There was no difference in the functional improvement in hearing in both the surgical groups for all patients, ≤ 8 years and > 8 years ( = 0.188 = 0.061, = 0.865 respectively). Mastoidectomy group showed significantly higher success outcome for air-filled middle ear space without atelectasis or OME for all patients, ≤ 8 years and > 8 years ( < 0.001, = 0.004, = 0.041 respectively).Overall success was significantly higher in mastoidectomy group for all patients and ≤ 8 years ( = 0.040, = 0.012 respectively),but not significantly different for > 8 years ( = 0.592).Out of the prognostic factors considered for success only the type of ear surgery performed showed as a better predictor for success (AUC = 0.606, = 0.046). Cortical mastoidectomy done along with type 1 tympanoplasty in paediatric patients with poor contralateral ear showed statistically significant higher overall success outcome. Although mastoidectomy done with type 1 tympanoplasty showed better success outcome in patients above 8 years, it was not statistically significant. Except the type of ear surgery performed, none of the prognostic factors considered could influence the success outcome. Our study recommends mastoidectomy to be combined with type 1 tympanoplasty in paediatric patients aged ≤ 8 years with poor contralateral ear status to enhance the overall success outcome.
本研究的目的是评估乳突根治术联合Ⅰ型鼓室成形术在对侧耳状况不佳的儿科患者治疗中的作用,并评估可能影响Ⅰ型鼓室成形术成功结果的预后因素。对112例4至12岁的儿科患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。研究中的所有患者均有双侧鼓膜穿孔。他们被随机分配接受Ⅰ型鼓室成形术(第1组,n = 56)或Ⅰ型鼓室成形术联合乳突根治术(第2组,n = 56)。在术后12个月比较两组的结果。评估的结果包括:1. 鼓膜的解剖状况;2. 听力功能改善(≥10分贝);3. 中耳气腔无肺不张或积液性中耳炎;4. 总体结果。还对年龄≤8岁(n = 51)和>8岁(n = 61)的手术组患者的结果进行了比较。评估了Ⅰ型鼓室成形术成功结果的预后因素。考虑的预后因素包括手术时的年龄、年龄组、手术前疾病持续时间、既往腺样体切除术、穿孔机制、穿孔位置、穿孔大小、所进行的耳部手术类型(有或无乳突根治术的鼓室成形术)。乳突根治术组鼓膜解剖状况的成功结果显著更高(P = 0.015),但在≤8岁和>8岁的患者中无显著差异(分别为P = 0.112,P = 0.064)。所有患者、≤8岁和>8岁的患者在两个手术组中的听力功能改善无差异(分别为P = 0.188,P = 0.061,P = 0.865)。乳突根治术组在所有患者、≤8岁和>8岁的患者中,中耳气腔无肺不张或积液性中耳炎的成功结果显著更高(分别为P < 0.001,P = 0.004,P = 0.041)。乳突根治术组在所有患者和≤8岁的患者中的总体成功率显著更高(分别为P = 0.040,P = 0.012),但在>8岁的患者中无显著差异(P = 0.592)。在所考虑的成功预后因素中,仅所进行的耳部手术类型显示为成功的更好预测指标(AUC = 0.606,P = 0.046)。在对侧耳状况不佳的儿科患者中,联合Ⅰ型鼓室成形术进行的皮质乳突根治术显示总体成功率在统计学上显著更高。尽管Ⅰ型鼓室成形术联合乳突根治术在8岁以上患者中显示出更好的成功结果,但无统计学意义。除所进行的耳部手术类型外,所考虑的预后因素均不能影响成功结果。我们的研究建议,对于对侧耳状况不佳的≤8岁儿科患者,应将乳突根治术与Ⅰ型鼓室成形术联合,以提高总体成功率。