Regional Centre for Transfusion Medicine, Bialystok, Poland.
Regional Centre for Transfusion Medicine, Bialystok, Poland.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Feb;62(1):103527. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2022.103527. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
Although IgG1 and IgG3 have been shown to be the dominant subclasses in the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, little is known about the distribution of IgG subclasses during the recovery phase of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze the profile of IgG subclasses in COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors.
A total of 36 convalescent plasma donors were included in the analysis. IgG and IgG subclass levels were measured using a nephelometric assay in plasma samples obtained directly from the plasma container.
Although there was no significant difference in the concentration of IgG subclasses between the study and control groups, the contribution of IgG1 to the total IgG pool between the study and control groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0478). In addition, there was a discrepancy between the total IgG and IgG sum values in the study group, exceeding 15 % in 19,4 % of samples (n = 7), while in the control group no samples with a sum/ total IgG difference > 15 % were observed.
The selective affinity of the IgG1 subclass for the polyclonal anti-IgG reagent may interfere with the determination of total IgG and should be considered when interpreting the results of enzyme immunoassays DATA AVAILABILITY: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
虽然 IgG1 和 IgG3 已被证明是 SARS-CoV-2 感染急性期的主要亚类,但 COVID-19 恢复期 IgG 亚类的分布情况知之甚少。本研究旨在分析 COVID-19 恢复期血浆捐献者的 IgG 亚类谱。
共纳入 36 名恢复期血浆捐献者进行分析。使用直接从血浆容器中获得的血浆样本,通过散射比浊法测定 IgG 和 IgG 亚类水平。
尽管研究组和对照组 IgG 亚类浓度无显著差异,但研究组 IgG1 对总 IgG 池的贡献与对照组相比具有统计学意义(p=0.0478)。此外,研究组的总 IgG 和 IgG 总和值之间存在差异,在 19.4%的样本(n=7)中超过 15%,而对照组中没有观察到总和/总 IgG 差值>15%的样本。
IgG1 亚类对多克隆抗 IgG 试剂的选择性亲和力可能会干扰总 IgG 的测定,在解释酶免疫测定的结果时应予以考虑。
支持本研究结果的数据可应要求向通讯作者索取。