• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的外科治疗:荟萃分析比较。

Surgical Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery.

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Associate Professor of General surgery Kasralainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Myrthyer Tydfil, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Oct 1;32(5):586-594. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001086.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001086
PMID:36044274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the widescale success of proton pump inhibitors to reducing the incidence of peptic ulcer disease, perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains a significant cause of severe complications and death. The implementation of open or surgical repair of PPU should be guided by reliable guidelines which are based on current systematic evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open repair of PPU.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on retrospective, prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. Duration of surgery and postoperative complications and death were collected from eligible studies, and the outcomes were pooled using mean differences (MD) or relative risks (RRs) for numerical and binary outcomes, respectively. The estimated variance was expressed as 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included (8456 patients, 56.08% underwent open repair, 6 prospective studies, 7 randomized clinical trials, and 32 retrospective studies). Compared with open repair, laparoscopic surgeries were associated with longer operative times (MD=8.36, 95% CI, 0.49-16.22), shorter hospital stay (MD=-2.74, 95% CI, -3.70 to-1.79), a higher risk of suture leakage (RR=1.91, 95% CI, 1.04-3.49) and lower risks of mortality (RR=0.57, 95% CI, 0.47-0.70), septic shock (RR=0.69, 95% CI, 0.49-0.98), renal failure (RR=0.38, 95% CI, 0.18-0.79), and wound infection (RR=0.26, 95% CI, 0.19-0.37).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of PPU showed promising safety outcomes; however, future well-designed randomized studies are warranted to reduce the observed performance bias and possible selection bias in individual studies.

摘要

背景

尽管质子泵抑制剂的广泛应用已经降低了消化性溃疡病的发病率,但穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)仍然是导致严重并发症和死亡的重要原因。PPU 的开放式或手术修复应基于可靠的指南,这些指南是基于当前的系统证据制定的。

目的

评估腹腔镜与开放式 PPU 修复的疗效和安全性。

方法

基于回顾性、前瞻性队列研究和随机临床试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。从合格研究中收集手术持续时间和术后并发症及死亡率,并使用数值和二项结局的均数差值(MD)或相对风险(RR)分别对结局进行汇总。估计的方差表示为 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

纳入了 45 项研究(8456 例患者,56.08%接受了开放式修复,6 项前瞻性研究,7 项随机临床试验,32 项回顾性研究)。与开放式修复相比,腹腔镜手术的手术时间更长(MD=8.36,95%CI,0.49-16.22),住院时间更短(MD=-2.74,95%CI,-3.70 至-1.79),缝合口漏的风险更高(RR=1.91,95%CI,1.04-3.49),死亡率(RR=0.57,95%CI,0.47-0.70)、感染性休克(RR=0.69,95%CI,0.49-0.98)、肾衰竭(RR=0.38,95%CI,0.18-0.79)和伤口感染(RR=0.26,95%CI,0.19-0.37)的风险更低。

结论

腹腔镜修复 PPU 的安全性结果令人鼓舞;然而,未来需要进行精心设计的随机研究,以减少个别研究中观察到的表现偏倚和可能的选择偏倚。

相似文献

1
Surgical Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的外科治疗:荟萃分析比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Oct 1;32(5):586-594. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001086.
2
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair.腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡病的疗效优于开放性修补。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar;23(3):618-625. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4047-8. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
4
A comparative study on laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for perforated peptic ulcer repair: efficacy and outcomes analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的比较研究:疗效与结局分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 14;408(1):435. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03171-1.
5
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD004778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub3.
6
Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treatment: an Italian nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study investigating laparoscopic vs open approach.穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)的治疗:一项意大利全国倾向评分匹配队列研究,调查腹腔镜与开放手术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5137-5149. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09998-5. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
Comparison of Omental Patch Closure Versus Simple Closure for Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.网膜补丁缝合与单纯缝合在腹腔镜穿孔性消化性溃疡修补术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):2005-2013. doi: 10.1177/00031348211067991. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub2.
9
Laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: an English national population-based cohort study.腹腔镜手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡:一项英国全国基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3783-3788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6058-7. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
10
Laparoscopic versus open operation for perforated peptic ulcer in pediatric patients: A 10-year experience.小儿穿孔性消化性溃疡的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:10年经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Dec;50(12):2038-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative treatments to treat perforated peptic ulcer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的替代疗法:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 11;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00599-2.
2
Laparoscopic suture repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease: a meta-review and trial sequential analysis.腹腔镜缝合修复术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病:一项Meta综述与试验序贯分析
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 12;12:1496192. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1496192. eCollection 2025.
3
Experience of management of pediatric upper gastrointestinal perforations: a series of 30 cases.
小儿上消化道穿孔的管理经验:30例系列报道
Front Pediatr. 2023 Oct 11;11:1261336. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1261336. eCollection 2023.