Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, GW Medical Faculty Associates Voice Treatment Center, Washington, DC.
ENT Department, European Institute for ORL-HNS, GZA Hospital Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Sep 12;65(9):3392-3404. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00599. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
The purposes of this study were to determine whether the acoustic measures from glottal stops distinguished between controls and patients with unilateral vocal fold paresis/paralysis (UVFP) at initial evaluation and posttreatment/observation, to explore the types of false vocal fold (FVF) movement during glottal stop production in UVFP, and to assess the agreement between normalization of various measures and reported voice normalization.
Patients with UVFP and controls were recorded acoustically and laryngoscopically speaking two sets of five repeated /i/s, controls once and patients with UVFP initially and posttreatment/observation. Averaged intensity differences and slopes for offsets (maximum voicing intensity to minimum glottal stop intensity) and onsets (minimum glottal stop intensity to maximum voicing intensity) were measured. FVF movements were rated separately for paretic and nonparetic sides. Patients were asked to report voice normalization posttreatment/observation. Cohen's kappas were calculated for agreements between patient-reported voice normalization and normalization of Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), translaryngeal flow, four acoustic measures of glottal stop production, and FVF movement.
Significant differences (analysis of variance [ANOVA]; < .014) were found for all acoustic measures between controls and patients with UVFP and between patients with UVFP initially and posttreatment/observation (paired tests; < .05). In addition, 78% of UVFP patients had no FVF movement on the paretic side initially, and 42% had bilateral dynamic FVF movement posttreatment/observation. Cohen's kappa showed moderate agreement between voice normalization and V-RQOL, slight agreement with offset measures, and fair agreement with onset measures.
This study provided proof of concept for using acoustic measures of glottal stops to distinguish between controls and patients with UVFP, both initially and posttreatment/observation.
本研究旨在确定声门停止时的声学测量值是否可以在初始评估和治疗后/观察时区分单侧声带麻痹/瘫痪(UVFP)患者与对照组,探索 UVFP 患者在发声门停止时假声带(FVF)的运动类型,并评估各种测量值的归一化与报告的声音归一化之间的一致性。
记录了 UVFP 患者和对照组在说两组五次重复的/i/时的声学和喉镜图像,对照组说一次,UVFP 患者则在初始和治疗后/观察时各说一次。测量了偏移(最大发声强度到最小声门停止强度)和起始(最小声门停止强度到最大发声强度)的平均强度差异和斜率。分别对麻痹侧和非麻痹侧的 FVF 运动进行评分。患者在治疗后/观察时被要求报告声音归一化情况。计算了患者报告的声音归一化与语音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)、经声门流量、四种声门停止产生的声学测量值和 FVF 运动归一化之间的一致性的 Cohen's kappa。
在对照组和 UVFP 患者之间以及在 UVFP 患者初始和治疗后/观察之间(配对 t 检验;<0.05),所有声学测量值均存在显著差异(方差分析[ANOVA];<0.014)。此外,78%的 UVFP 患者在初始时麻痹侧没有 FVF 运动,42%的患者在治疗后/观察时有双侧动态 FVF 运动。Cohen's kappa 显示声音归一化与 V-RQOL 之间存在中度一致性,与偏移测量值之间存在轻微一致性,与起始测量值之间存在公平一致性。
本研究提供了使用声门停止时的声学测量值来区分 UVFP 患者和对照组的概念验证,无论是在初始还是治疗后/观察时。