• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性队列研究:6-硫鸟嘌呤对比 6-巯基嘌呤维持治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效、安全性和临床价值。

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Value of 6-TG versus 6-MP Maintenance Therapy in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 21;2022:7580642. doi: 10.1155/2022/7580642. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/7580642
PMID:36046443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9420618/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy, safety, and clinical value of 6-TG versus 6-MP when treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODS

The study period was from January 2017 to June 2021. The subjects of this study were 100 children with ALL who were treated in our hospital. According to different intervention methods, the children who received 6-MP maintenance therapy were selected as the control group, with a total of 57 cases. Children with TG maintenance therapy were included in the research group, a total of 43 cases. The ICNS recurrence rate, non-ICNS recurrence rate, first remission mortality rate, secondary malignant tumor, and other indicators were compared.

RESULTS

First of all, we compared the effective rate: complete remission (CR), partial remission, and nonremission in the study group, and the effective rate was 87.5%. In the control group, there were CR, partial remission, and no remission, and the effective rate was 65.5%. The effective rate of the study group was higher, and the difference between groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). There were 55 cases of failure in the study group, with an incidence of 21.91%. There were 42 cases of total failure events in the control group, the incidence rate was 18.02%, and there exhibited no remarkable difference ( > 0.05). In the study group, 6 cases died in the first remission, with a fatality rate of 2.39%, while there exhibited no death in the control group. The mortality in the first remission period in the study group was lower ( < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate of the study group was 5.57%, while that of the control group was 11.15%. The overall recurrence rate of the study group was lower, and the difference between groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). The recurrence rate of ICNS was 2.14% in the study group and 2.98% in the control group, and there exhibited no remarkable difference ( > 0.05). The non-ICNS recurrence rate was 3.43% in the study group and 7.17% in the control group. There exhibited no remarkable difference ( > 0.05). The incidence of secondary malignant tumor events was 0.85% in the study group and 1.59% in the control group. There exhibited no remarkable difference ( > 0.05). The incidence of hepatic vein occlusive disease was 7.29% in the study group and 2.39% in the control group. The incidence of hepatic vein occlusive disease in the study group was higher, and the difference between groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). Finally, we compared the incidence of adverse reactions. In the study group, there were 12 cases of oral mucosal damage, 7 cases of liver function damage, 6 cases of infection, 10 cases of myelosuppression, 9 cases of gastrointestinal reaction, and 4 cases of skin damage; the incidence rate was 23.17%. In the control group, there were 12 cases of oral mucosal damage, 7 cases of liver function damage, 6 cases of infection, 10 cases of myelosuppression, 9 cases of gastrointestinal reaction, and 4 cases of skin damage, with an incidence of 19.12%. There exhibited no remarkable difference in the incidence of adverse reactions ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

6-TG maintenance therapy in children with ALL can enhance the overall effective rate, can reduce the first remission mortality and the total recurrence rate, and will not increase the overall incidence of adverse reactions, but the incidence of reversible or irreversible hepatic veno-occlusive disease is remarkably increased, which has a certain clinical value.

BACKGROUND

Treatment-related hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression remain formidable challenges for clinicians. Pharmacokinetic studies found that 6-TG has a more direct intracellular activation pathway, shorter cytotoxic time, and stronger potency than 6-MP. Therefore, this study investigated the efficacy, safety, and clinical value of 6-TG and 6-MP in the treatment of children with ALL.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f8/9420618/4320bc4dcbd1/BMRI2022-7580642.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f8/9420618/fd25cdf22649/BMRI2022-7580642.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f8/9420618/4320bc4dcbd1/BMRI2022-7580642.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f8/9420618/fd25cdf22649/BMRI2022-7580642.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f8/9420618/4320bc4dcbd1/BMRI2022-7580642.002.jpg
摘要

目的

探讨 6-巯基嘌呤(6-TG)与 6-巯基鸟嘌呤(6-MP)治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的疗效、安全性和临床价值。

方法

研究期间为 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月。选择我院收治的 100 例 ALL 患儿为研究对象,根据不同的干预方法,将接受 6-MP 维持治疗的患儿作为对照组,共 57 例;将接受 TG 维持治疗的患儿纳入研究组,共 43 例。比较两组患儿的累积无事件复发率(EFS)、非累积无事件复发率(NCR)、首次缓解期死亡率、继发恶性肿瘤等指标。

结果

首先,我们比较了有效率:研究组的完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解和未缓解,有效率为 87.5%。对照组的 CR、部分缓解和未缓解,有效率为 65.5%。研究组的有效率更高,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。研究组有 55 例失败,发生率为 21.91%。对照组总失败事件 42 例,发生率为 18.02%,组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。研究组首次缓解期死亡 6 例,死亡率为 2.39%,对照组无死亡。研究组首次缓解期死亡率较低(<0.05)。研究组的总体复发率为 5.57%,对照组为 11.15%。研究组的总体复发率较低,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。研究组 CNS 复发率为 2.14%,对照组为 2.98%,组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。非 CNS 复发率为 3.43%,对照组为 7.17%,组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。继发恶性肿瘤事件发生率为 0.85%,对照组为 1.59%,组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。肝静脉闭塞病发生率为 7.29%,对照组为 2.39%,研究组的发生率较高,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。最后,我们比较了不良反应的发生率。研究组口腔黏膜损伤 12 例,肝功能损害 7 例,感染 6 例,骨髓抑制 10 例,胃肠道反应 9 例,皮肤损伤 4 例,发生率为 23.17%;对照组口腔黏膜损伤 12 例,肝功能损害 7 例,感染 6 例,骨髓抑制 10 例,胃肠道反应 9 例,皮肤损伤 4 例,发生率为 19.12%。两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

6-TG 维持治疗儿童 ALL 可提高总体有效率,降低首次缓解期死亡率和总复发率,不会增加不良反应的总体发生率,但会显著增加可逆或不可逆的肝静脉阻塞性疾病的发生率,具有一定的临床价值。

背景

治疗相关的肝毒性和骨髓抑制仍然是临床医生面临的巨大挑战。药代动力学研究发现,6-TG 具有更直接的细胞内激活途径,细胞毒性时间更短,效力比 6-MP 更强。因此,本研究探讨了 6-TG 和 6-MP 在治疗儿童 ALL 中的疗效、安全性和临床价值。

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Value of 6-TG versus 6-MP Maintenance Therapy in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.回顾性队列研究:6-硫鸟嘌呤对比 6-巯基嘌呤维持治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效、安全性和临床价值。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 21;2022:7580642. doi: 10.1155/2022/7580642. eCollection 2022.
2
Oral 6-mercaptopurine versus oral 6-thioguanine and veno-occlusive disease in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report of the Children's Oncology Group CCG-1952 clinical trial.口服 6-巯基嘌呤与口服 6-硫鸟嘌呤在标准风险急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿中的应用及静脉闭塞病:儿童肿瘤学组 CCG-1952 临床试验报告。
Blood. 2010 Apr 8;115(14):2740-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230656. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Substitution of oral and intravenous thioguanine for mercaptopurine in a treatment regimen for children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a collaborative Children's Oncology Group/National Cancer Institute pilot trial (CCG-1942).在标准风险急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童治疗方案中用口服和静脉注射硫鸟嘌呤替代巯嘌呤:儿童肿瘤学组/美国国立癌症研究所合作试点试验(CCG - 1942)
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Sep;49(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20964.
4
[Tolerability of 6-mercaptopurine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia].6-巯基嘌呤在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病中的耐受性
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Apr;48(4):289-92.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety of 6-thioguanine in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.6-硫鸟嘌呤治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(18):e20082. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020082.
6
Veno-occlusive disease in patients receiving thiopurines during maintenance therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病维持治疗期间接受硫嘌呤类药物治疗的患者发生肝静脉闭塞病。
Br J Haematol. 2003 Oct;123(1):100-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04578.x.
7
[Efficacy of modified BFM-90 regimen on children and adolescents with T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report of 20 cases].改良BFM-90方案治疗儿童及青少年T细胞淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤的疗效:附20例报告
Ai Zheng. 2004 Dec;23(12):1687-91.
8
[Effect of Huangqi injection on short-term prognosis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia].黄芪注射液对急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿短期预后的影响
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;16(2):141-6.
9
Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final report and long-term survival follow-up from the randomized, phase 3 INO-VATE study.依妥珠单抗奥滨尤妥珠单抗对比既往治疗复发或难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病:来自随机、3 期 INO-VATE 研究的最终报告和长期生存随访。
Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2474-2487. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32116. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
[Treatment outcome of childhood standard-risk and median-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with CCLG-2008 protocol].[采用CCLG - 2008方案治疗儿童标准风险和中度风险急性淋巴细胞白血病的治疗结果]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;52(6):449-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of illness of non-hematopoietic stem cell transplant-related hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: A systematic review.非造血干细胞移植相关肝窦阻塞综合征的疾病负担:一项系统评价。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 31;10(20):e36883. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36883. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
2
Retracted: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Value of 6-TG versus 6-MP Maintenance Therapy in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.撤回:一项关于6-硫鸟嘌呤与6-巯基嘌呤维持治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效、安全性及临床价值的回顾性队列研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Dec 29;2023:9807165. doi: 10.1155/2023/9807165. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: basic science and clinical translations.急性淋巴细胞白血病的维持治疗:基础科学与临床转化。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1749-1758. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01591-4. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
[Efficacy of Posaconazole for Primary Prophylaxis in the Induction Therapy of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia].泊沙康唑在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病诱导治疗中的一级预防疗效
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec;29(6):1710-1713. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.06.003.
3
Unbalance in Iron Metabolism in Childhood Leukemia Converges with Treatment Intensity: Biochemical and Clinical Analysis.
Ubiquitin-proteasome system as a target for anticancer treatment-an update.
泛素-蛋白酶体系统作为抗癌治疗的靶点——更新。
Arch Pharm Res. 2023 Jul;46(7):573-597. doi: 10.1007/s12272-023-01455-0. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
儿童白血病铁代谢失衡与治疗强度相关:生化与临床分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;13(12):3029. doi: 10.3390/cancers13123029.
4
Negative Rhesus Antigen D in Childhood Leukemia: A Risk Factor or a Defense Mechanism?儿童白血病中的阴性恒河猴抗原D:是危险因素还是防御机制?
Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):1077-1078. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6129.
5
[Analysis on Death Cases in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with the CCLG-ALL 2008 Protocol].[CCLG-ALL 2008方案治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病死亡病例分析]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;29(3):720-724. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.03.011.
6
[The Factors Related to Treatment Failure in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia].[儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗失败的相关因素]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;29(3):661-668. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.03.002.
7
A Hopeful Leap Forward by Multicentric Cooperation for Precision-Based Therapy for Very Resistant, Relapsed, or Refractory Childhood Leukemia.多中心合作推动精准治疗,攻克耐药、复发或难治性儿童白血病。
Cancer Discov. 2021 Jun;11(6):1322-1323. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0258.
8
Increments in DNA-thioguanine level during thiopurine-enhanced maintenance therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.在急性淋巴细胞白血病的硫唑嘌呤增强维持治疗期间,DNA-硫鸟嘌呤水平的增加。
Haematologica. 2021 Nov 1;106(11):2824-2833. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.278166.
9
The Prenatal Origin of Childhood Leukemia: Potential Applications for Epidemiology and Newborn Screening.儿童白血病的产前起源:在流行病学和新生儿筛查中的潜在应用
Front Pediatr. 2021 Apr 23;9:639479. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.639479. eCollection 2021.
10
Birth characteristics and childhood leukemia in Switzerland: a register-based case-control study.瑞士的出生特征与儿童白血病:基于登记的病例对照研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Jul;32(7):713-723. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01423-3. Epub 2021 Apr 20.