Suppr超能文献

股动脉到肱动脉预加载输送系统在复杂主动脉瘤腔内修复中的应用:单中心经验。

Single-Center Experience with the Femoral-to-Brachial Preloaded Delivery System for Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms.

机构信息

McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Oct;45(10):1451-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03252-6. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess technical aspects and outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) using a femoral-to-brachial (FTB) preloaded delivery system (PDS) with two separate configurations.

METHODS

Clinical data of all consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate FB-EVAR for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs & TAAA) between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients treated with FTB-PDS were included. The two configurations included 4 trans-brachial preloaded wires (4BR) or 2 trans-brachial and 2 transfemoral preloaded wires (2BR-2FE). Outcome measures included technical success, procedural metrics, 30-day or in-hospital mortality, major adverse events (MAEs), and target-vessel outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 115 patients with a mean age of 73.8 ± 8 years, treated with FTB-PDS. Of these, 62 patients (54%) had 4BR and 53 patients (46%) had 2BR-2FE FTB-PDS. There were 106 TAAA (92%) and 9 CAAAs (8%). Technical success, defined as successful implantation of the stent-graft and all intended target-vessel stents without type I or III endoleak, was 97%, with no differences in total operating time, endovascular time, and radiation dose between groups. There were 3 deaths (3%) at 30 days. MAEs were noticed in 21 patients (18%) with no difference between groups, including new-onset dialysis (2% vs. 4%, P = 0.59), and paraplegia (7% vs. 11%, P = 0.51), for 4BR and 2BR-2FE, respectively. Patient survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality at 2-years were 79 ± 5% and 97 ± 1.7%, respectively, with no difference between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of FTB-PDS for FB-EVAR is safe with high technical success and a reasonable rate of MAEs. Each configuration provides specific benefits based on patient anatomy, while having similar procedural metrics and clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估使用具有两种不同构型的股腘(FTB)预加载输送系统(PDS)进行开窗分支腔内主动脉修复(FB-EVAR)的技术方面和结果。

方法

回顾了 2013 年至 2020 年间,连续入组一项前瞻性研究评估复杂胸腹主动脉瘤(CAAA 和 TAAA)的 FB-EVAR 治疗的所有患者的临床数据。纳入接受 FTB-PDS 治疗的患者。两种构型包括 4 根经肱动脉预加载导丝(4BR)或 2 根经肱动脉和 2 根经股动脉预加载导丝(2BR-2FE)。观察指标包括技术成功率、手术指标、30 天或住院死亡率、主要不良事件(MAE)和靶血管结果。

结果

115 例患者平均年龄 73.8±8 岁,接受 FTB-PDS 治疗。其中,62 例(54%)患者采用 4BR,53 例(46%)患者采用 2BR-2FE FTB-PDS。106 例 TAAA(92%)和 9 例 CAAA(8%)。技术成功率定义为支架移植物和所有预期的靶血管支架成功植入,无 I 型或 III 型内漏,成功率为 97%,两组之间的总手术时间、腔内时间和辐射剂量无差异。30 天死亡率为 3%(3 例)。21 例(18%)患者出现 MAE,两组之间无差异,包括新发透析(2%比 4%,P=0.59)和截瘫(7%比 11%,P=0.51),分别为 4BR 和 2BR-2FE。2 年时患者生存率和免于主动脉相关死亡率分别为 79±5%和 97±1.7%,两组之间无差异。

结论

使用 FTB-PDS 进行 FB-EVAR 是安全的,技术成功率高,MAE 发生率合理。每种构型都根据患者的解剖结构提供了特定的优势,同时具有相似的手术指标和临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验