• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚希姆巴山人类-野生动物-家畜交界地区采采蝇传播锥虫风险的昆虫学评估

Entomological assessment of tsetse-borne trypanosome risk in the Shimba Hills human-wildlife-livestock interface, Kenya.

作者信息

Ebhodaghe Faith I, Bastos Armanda D S, Okal Michael N, Masiga Daniel K

机构信息

International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 16;9:931078. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.931078. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fvets.2022.931078
PMID:36051538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9424651/
Abstract

Shimba Hills is a wildlife area in Kenya and a major focus of tsetse-borne trypanosomes in East Africa. In Shimba Hills, tsetse-borne trypanosomes constrain animal health and smallholder livelihoods. However, epidemiological data to guide hotspot-targeted control of infections are limited. This study assessed the dynamics of tsetse-borne trypanosome risk in Shimba Hills with the objective to describe infection hotspots for targeted control. Tsetse flies ( = 696) collected in field surveys between November 2018 and September 2019 in Shimba Hills were characterized for chronological age and phenotypic sizes and screened for trypanosome and cattle DNA. Entomological inoculation rates for trypanosome risk assessment were derived from the product of fly abundance and molecular rates of vector infection and confirmed cattle bloodmeals in tsetse flies. In addition, cattle health indicators including anemia scores were assessed in contemporaneous parasitological surveys that screened livestock blood samples ( = 1,417) for trypanosome using the buffy-coat technique. Compared with and was the most abundant tsetse fly species in Shimba Hills and had a wider spatial distribution and greater likelihood for infectious bites on cattle. The risk of cattle infection was similar along the Shimba Hills human-wildlife-livestock interface and high within one thousand meters of the wildlife reserve boundary. Trypanosomes in tsetse flies were highly diverse and included parasites of wild-suids probably acquired from warthogs in Shimba Hills. Age and phenotypic sizes were similar between tsetse fly populations and did not affect the probability of infection or cattle bloodmeals in the vectors. Anemia was more likely in trypanosome-positive cattle whilst parasitological infection rates in cattle samples maintained a weak relationship with entomological inoculation rates probably because of the limited time scale of sample collection. Trypanosome risk in Shimba Hills is high in locations close to the wildlife reserve and driven by infectious bites on cattle. Therefore, trypanosome vector control programmes in the area should be designed to reduce abundance and tailored to target sites close to the wildlife reserve.

摘要

欣巴丘陵是肯尼亚的一个野生动物保护区,也是东非采采蝇传播锥虫的主要集中区域。在欣巴丘陵,采采蝇传播的锥虫对动物健康和小农户生计构成了限制。然而,用于指导针对感染热点地区进行控制的流行病学数据有限。本研究评估了欣巴丘陵采采蝇传播锥虫风险的动态变化,目的是描述感染热点地区以便进行有针对性的控制。在2018年11月至2019年9月期间于欣巴丘陵进行的实地调查中收集了采采蝇( = 696只),对其按年龄顺序和表型大小进行了特征分析,并筛查了锥虫和牛的DNA。采采蝇传播锥虫风险评估的昆虫学接种率来自采采蝇数量与媒介感染分子率以及采采蝇中确认的牛血餐的乘积。此外,在同期的寄生虫学调查中评估了包括贫血评分在内的牛健康指标,该调查使用血沉棕黄层技术对家畜血液样本( = 1417份)进行锥虫筛查。与 相比, 是欣巴丘陵数量最多的采采蝇种类,其空间分布更广,叮咬牛并导致感染的可能性更大。在欣巴丘陵的人类 - 野生动物 - 家畜交界处,牛感染的风险相似,而在距离野生动物保护区边界一千米范围内风险较高。采采蝇体内的锥虫种类高度多样,并包括可能从欣巴丘陵的疣猪身上获得的野生猪科寄生虫。采采蝇种群之间的年龄和表型大小相似,并且不影响感染概率或媒介中的牛血餐情况。锥虫检测呈阳性的牛更易出现贫血,而牛样本中的寄生虫感染率与昆虫学接种率之间的关系较弱,这可能是由于样本采集的时间范围有限。欣巴丘陵靠近野生动物保护区的地区锥虫风险较高,且由 对牛的感染性叮咬所致。因此,该地区的锥虫病媒介控制计划应旨在减少 的数量,并针对靠近野生动物保护区的目标地点进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/1f72d3bbba06/fvets-09-931078-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/ade08d6ac8c0/fvets-09-931078-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/3e48de66a61c/fvets-09-931078-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/697cee9592ab/fvets-09-931078-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/8b8dc0a9d130/fvets-09-931078-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/c670508fb7ad/fvets-09-931078-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/ee768735d827/fvets-09-931078-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/01991bc151b1/fvets-09-931078-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/ce5c8e7cd335/fvets-09-931078-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/bda01227dffe/fvets-09-931078-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/a8a20ac607d6/fvets-09-931078-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/1f72d3bbba06/fvets-09-931078-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/ade08d6ac8c0/fvets-09-931078-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/3e48de66a61c/fvets-09-931078-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/697cee9592ab/fvets-09-931078-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/8b8dc0a9d130/fvets-09-931078-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/c670508fb7ad/fvets-09-931078-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/ee768735d827/fvets-09-931078-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/01991bc151b1/fvets-09-931078-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/ce5c8e7cd335/fvets-09-931078-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/bda01227dffe/fvets-09-931078-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/a8a20ac607d6/fvets-09-931078-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/9424651/1f72d3bbba06/fvets-09-931078-g0011.jpg

相似文献

1
Entomological assessment of tsetse-borne trypanosome risk in the Shimba Hills human-wildlife-livestock interface, Kenya.肯尼亚希姆巴山人类-野生动物-家畜交界地区采采蝇传播锥虫风险的昆虫学评估
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 16;9:931078. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.931078. eCollection 2022.
2
Tsetse Bloodmeal Analyses Incriminate the Common Warthog as an Important Cryptic Host of Animal Trypanosomes in Smallholder Cattle Farming Communities in Shimba Hills, Kenya.采采蝇血餐分析表明,普通疣猪是肯尼亚希姆巴山小农户养牛社区动物锥虫的重要隐匿宿主。
Pathogens. 2021 Nov 18;10(11):1501. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10111501.
3
Molecular characterization of Trypanosoma vivax in tsetse flies confirms the presence of the virulent Tvv4 genotype in Kenya: Potential implications for the control of trypanosomiasis in Shimba Hills.采采蝇中冈比亚锥虫的分子特征证实了肯尼亚存在毒力强的 Tvv4 基因型:对 Shimba Hills 地区锥虫病控制的潜在影响。
Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Sep;93:104953. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104953. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
Bloodmeal host identities among sympatric and tsetse flies in Shimba Hills National Reserve, Kwale, Kenya.肯尼亚夸莱县希姆巴山国家保护区内同域采采蝇的血餐宿主身份
Front Trop Dis. 2023;4. doi: 10.3389/fitd.2023.1145993. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Tsetse blood-meal sources, endosymbionts and trypanosome-associations in the Maasai Mara National Reserve, a wildlife-human-livestock interface.在马赛马拉国家保护区(野生动物-人类-牲畜交界区)中采采蝇的血食源、共生菌和锥虫的共生关系。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jan 6;15(1):e0008267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008267. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Sodalis glossinidius presence in wild tsetse is only associated with presence of trypanosomes in complex interactions with other tsetse-specific factors.在野生采采蝇中,Sodalis glossinidius 的存在仅与锥体虫的存在相关,在与其他采采蝇特有的因素的复杂相互作用中。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18(Suppl 1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1285-6.
7
Blood meal analysis of tsetse flies ( : Glossinidae) reveals higher host fidelity on wild compared with domestic hosts.采采蝇(舌蝇科)的血餐分析表明,与家养宿主相比,采采蝇对野生宿主具有更高的宿主忠诚度。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:213. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16978.1. eCollection 2021.
8
Satellite-based modelling of potential tsetse (Glossina pallidipes) breeding and foraging sites using teneral and non-teneral fly occurrence data.利用半僵蝇和非半僵蝇出现数据进行基于卫星的潜在采采蝇(Glossina pallidipes)滋生地和觅食地建模。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Sep 28;14(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05017-5.
9
Prevalence of trypanosomes associated with drug resistance in Shimba Hills, Kwale County, Kenya.肯尼亚夸莱县欣巴丘陵地区与耐药性相关的锥虫流行情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Apr 29;13(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05077-3.
10
A comparison of susceptibility of two allopatric populations of Glossina pallidipes for stocks of Trypanosoma congolense.淡足舌蝇两个异域种群对刚果锥虫株的易感性比较。
Med Vet Entomol. 1993 Oct;7(4):369-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1993.tb00707.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights into trypanosomiasis transmission: Age, infection rates, and bloodmeal analysis of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes in N.W. Uganda.了解锥虫病传播:乌干达西北部冈比亚按蚊的年龄、感染率和血食分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Oct 31;18(10):e0011805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011805. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
The elimination of human African trypanosomiasis: Monitoring progress towards the 2021-2030 WHO road map targets.消除非洲人类锥虫病:监测实现世卫组织 2021-2030 年路线图目标的进展情况。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Apr 16;18(4):e0012111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012111. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Evidence-based advice on timing and location of tsetse control measures in Shimba Hills National reserve, Kenya.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic connectivity of trypanosomes between tsetse-infested and tsetse-free areas of Kenya.肯尼亚有采采蝇和无采采蝇地区间锥虫的遗传连通性。
Parasitology. 2022 Mar;149(3):285-297. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021001815. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Prevalence of Trypanosome Species in Cattle Near Ruma National Park, Lambwe Valley, Kenya: An Update From the Historical Focus for African Trypanosomosis.肯尼亚拉姆韦谷鲁马国家公园附近牛群中锥虫种类的流行情况:非洲锥虫病历史重点地区的最新情况
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 2;8:750169. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.750169. eCollection 2021.
3
Blood meal analysis of tsetse flies ( : Glossinidae) reveals higher host fidelity on wild compared with domestic hosts.
肯尼亚 Shimba Hills 国家保护区采采蝇控制措施的时间和地点的循证建议。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Jun 5;17(6):e0011398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011398. eCollection 2023 Jun.
采采蝇(舌蝇科)的血餐分析表明,与家养宿主相比,采采蝇对野生宿主具有更高的宿主忠诚度。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:213. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16978.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Farmer perceptions and willingness to pay for novel livestock pest control technologies: A case of tsetse repellent collar in Kwale County in Kenya.肯尼亚夸莱县新型牲畜害虫防治技术的农民认知和支付意愿:驱牛颈圈案例。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Aug 17;15(8):e0009663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009663. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
An update on the distribution of Glossina (tsetse flies) at the wildlife-human-livestock interface of Akagera National Park, Rwanda.卢旺达阿卡盖拉国家公园野生动物-人类-牲畜界面上舌蝇(采采蝇)分布的最新情况。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Jun 2;14(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04786-3.
6
Effects of Human Settlements and Spatial Distribution of Wing Vein Length, Wing Fray Categories and Hunger Stages in Glossina morsitans morsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae) and Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Areas Devoid of Cattle in North-Eastern Zambia.赞比亚东北部无牛地区舌蝇属(双翅目:舌蝇科)中摩氏舌蝇和褐边舌蝇的人类住区和翅脉长度、翅残损种类以及饥饿等级的空间分布的影响。
J Med Entomol. 2021 Mar 12;58(2):891-899. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa228.
7
The Role of Vector Trait Variation in Vector-Borne Disease Dynamics.媒介性状变异在媒介传播疾病动态中的作用
Front Ecol Evol. 2020 Jul;8. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00189. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Developing a national atlas to support the progressive control of tsetse-transmitted animal trypanosomosis in Kenya.开发国家地图集以支持肯尼亚逐步控制采采蝇传播的动物锥虫病。
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jun 5;13(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04156-5.
9
Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits.采采蝇(Glossina spp.)的翅长和宿主位置:利用固定诱饵控制的意义。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jan 11;12(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3274-x.
10
Sodalis glossinidius presence in wild tsetse is only associated with presence of trypanosomes in complex interactions with other tsetse-specific factors.在野生采采蝇中,Sodalis glossinidius 的存在仅与锥体虫的存在相关,在与其他采采蝇特有的因素的复杂相互作用中。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18(Suppl 1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1285-6.