López-Silva Pablo, Cavieres Álvaro, Humpston Clara
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Millennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 16;13:826654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.826654. eCollection 2022.
In trying to make sense of the extensive phenomenological variation of first-personal reports on auditory verbal hallucinations, the concept of pseudohallucination is originally introduced to designate any hallucinatory-like phenomena not exhibiting some of the paradigmatic features of "genuine" hallucinations. After its introduction, Karl Jaspers locates the notion of pseudohallucinations into the auditory domain, appealing to a distinction between hallucinatory voices heard within the subjective space (pseudohallucination) and voices heard in the external space (real hallucinations) with differences in their sensory richness. Jaspers' characterization of the term has been the target of a number of phenomenological, conceptual and empirically-based criticisms. From this latter point of view, it has been claimed that the concept cannot capture phenomena at the neurobiological level. Over the last years, the notion of pseudohallucination seems to be falling into disuse as no major diagnostic system seems to refer to it. In this paper, we propose that even if the concept of pseudohallucination is not helpful to differentiate phenomena at the neurobiological level, the inner/outer distinction highlighted by Jaspers' characterization of the term still remains an open explanatory challenge for dominant theories about the neurocognitive origin of auditory verbal hallucinations. We call this, "". After exploring this issue in detail, we propose some phenomenological, conceptual, and empirical paths for future research that might help to build up a more contextualized and dynamic view of auditory verbal hallucinatory phenomena.
在试图理解关于幻听的第一人称报告中广泛的现象学变异时,假性幻觉的概念最初被引入,用于指称任何不具备“真性”幻觉某些典型特征的类似幻觉的现象。在其被引入后,卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯将假性幻觉的概念定位到听觉领域,借助于在主观空间中听到的幻觉声音(假性幻觉)与在外部空间中听到的声音(真性幻觉)之间的区别,二者在感官丰富度上存在差异。雅斯贝尔斯对该术语的描述一直是一些现象学、概念性和基于实证的批评的对象。从后一种观点来看,有人声称该概念无法在神经生物学层面捕捉现象。在过去几年里,假性幻觉的概念似乎已不再使用,因为似乎没有主要的诊断系统提及它。在本文中,我们提出,即使假性幻觉的概念无助于在神经生物学层面区分现象,但雅斯贝尔斯对该术语的描述所强调的内外区分,对于关于幻听的神经认知起源的主流理论而言,仍然是一个有待解决的解释性挑战。我们将此称为“”。在详细探讨这个问题之后,我们提出了一些未来研究的现象学、概念性和实证性路径,这些路径可能有助于建立一个关于幻听现象的更具情境性和动态性的观点。