Constructional Approach to Animal Welfare and Training.
University of North Texas.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Sep;118(2):261-277. doi: 10.1002/jeab.786. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Functional analysis data and previous studies on animal training have demonstrated that social interaction with humans can serve as a reinforcer for animals. Yet, some studies have demonstrated that tactile interaction (e.g., patting, petting, or scratching) is less effective or ineffective when compared to food. However, the reinforcement procedures used may account for these discrepancies. The current study investigated whether tactile interaction, in the form of petting and scratching, could be used as a reinforcer to train behaviors to two horses and a mule. First, each equine learned when reinforcement would be available and what behaviors to engage in during reinforcement delivery. Next, a series of shaping steps and a changing-criterion design were used to test whether tactile interaction could be used to shape two new behaviors, stay and come. All three equines completed reinforcement training and met the mastery criteria for training stay and come. These results demonstrate that tactile interaction can be used as a reinforcer to train equines and also suggest that details of the reinforcement delivery process may be an important consideration when tactile interaction is used as a reinforcer.
功能分析数据和动物训练的先前研究表明,与人类的社交互动可以作为动物的强化物。然而,一些研究表明,与食物相比,触觉互动(例如拍打、抚摸或抓挠)的效果较差或无效。然而,使用的强化程序可能导致了这些差异。本研究调查了以抚摸和抓挠形式的触觉互动是否可以用作强化物来训练两匹马和一头骡子的行为。首先,每匹马都学会了何时有强化物以及在强化物传递期间应进行哪些行为。接下来,使用一系列塑造步骤和变更标准设计来测试触觉互动是否可用于塑造两个新行为,停留和过来。这三匹马都完成了强化训练,并达到了训练停留和过来的掌握标准。这些结果表明,触觉互动可以用作强化物来训练马,并且还表明,当触觉互动用作强化物时,强化物传递过程的细节可能是一个重要的考虑因素。