• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

36 孕周小胎龄儿预测的竞争风险模型。

Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate at 36 weeks' gestation.

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Fetal Medicine Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;60(5):612-619. doi: 10.1002/uog.26057. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1002/uog.26057
PMID:36056735
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop further a competing-risks model for the prediction of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate by including sonographically estimated fetal weight (EFW) and biomarkers of impaired placentation at 36 weeks' gestation, and to compare the performance of the new model with that of the traditional EFW < 10 percentile cut-off.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study in 29 035 women with a singleton pregnancy undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. A competing-risks model for the prediction of a SGA neonate was used. The parameters included in the prior-history model were provided in previous studies. An interaction continuous model was used for the EFW likelihood. A folded plane regression model was fitted to describe likelihoods of biomarkers of impaired placentation. Stratification plans were also developed. The new model was evaluated and compared with EFW percentile cut-offs.

RESULTS

The performance of the model was better for predicting SGA neonates delivered closer to the point of assessment. The prediction provided by maternal factors alone was improved significantly by the addition of EFW, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and placental growth factor (PlGF) but not by mean arterial pressure or soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. At a 10% false-positive rate, maternal factors and EFW predicted 77.6% and 65.8% of SGA neonates < 10 percentile delivered before 38 and 42 weeks, respectively. The respective figures for SGA < 3 percentile were 85.5% and 74.2%. Addition of UtA-PI and PlGF resulted in marginal improvement in prediction of SGA < 3 percentile requiring imminent delivery. A competing-risks approach that combines maternal factors and EFW performed better when compared with fixed EFW percentile cut-offs at predicting a SGA neonate, especially with increasing time interval between assessment and delivery. The new model was well-calibrated.

CONCLUSIONS

A competing-risks model provides effective risk stratification for a SGA neonate at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation and is superior to EFW percentile cut-offs. The use of biomarkers of impaired placentation in addition to maternal factors and fetal biometry results in small improvement of the predictive performance for a neonate with severe SGA. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

通过纳入 36 孕周时超声估计胎儿体重(EFW)和胎盘功能障碍的生物标志物,进一步开发预测小于胎龄儿(SGA)的竞争风险模型,并比较新模型与传统 EFW <10 百分位截断值的性能。

方法

这是一项在 29035 名单胎妊娠妇女中进行的前瞻性观察性研究,这些妇女在 35+0 至 36+6 孕周进行常规超声检查。使用竞争风险模型预测 SGA 新生儿。既往史模型中包含的参数在前瞻性研究中提供。EFW 似然性采用交互连续模型。拟合折叠平面回归模型描述胎盘功能障碍生物标志物的似然性。还制定了分层计划。评估新模型并与 EFW 百分位截断值进行比较。

结果

对于预测更接近评估点的 SGA 新生儿,该模型的表现更好。仅通过母体因素的预测通过添加 EFW、子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI)和胎盘生长因子(PlGF)得到显著改善,但通过平均动脉压或可溶性 fms 样酪氨酸激酶-1 则不然。在假阳性率为 10%时,母体因素和 EFW 分别预测了 38 周和 42 周前出生的 <10%百分位的 SGA 新生儿 77.6%和 65.8%,而对于 <3%百分位的 SGA 新生儿,这一比例分别为 85.5%和 74.2%。添加 UtA-PI 和 PlGF 可略微改善对需要立即分娩的 SGA <3%百分位的预测。与固定的 EFW 百分位截断值相比,结合母体因素和 EFW 的竞争风险方法在预测 35+0 至 36+6 孕周的 SGA 新生儿时表现更好,尤其是在评估与分娩之间的时间间隔增加时。新模型具有良好的校准度。

结论

竞争风险模型为 35+0 至 36+6 孕周的 SGA 新生儿提供了有效的风险分层,优于 EFW 百分位截断值。除了母体因素和胎儿生物测量外,使用胎盘功能障碍的生物标志物可略微提高严重 SGA 新生儿的预测性能。 © 2022 年国际妇产科超声学会。

相似文献

1
Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate at 36 weeks' gestation.36 孕周小胎龄儿预测的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;60(5):612-619. doi: 10.1002/uog.26057. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
2
Second-trimester contingent screening for small-for-gestational-age neonate.孕中期对小于胎龄儿的临机筛查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):177-184. doi: 10.1002/uog.23730. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
3
Evaluation of angiogenic factors in prediction of growth-related neonatal morbidity at term and comparison with competing-risks model.评估血管生成因子对足月新生儿生长相关发病率的预测价值,并与竞争风险模型进行比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;63(4):457-465. doi: 10.1002/uog.27533.
4
Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks' gestation.11-13 孕周时生物物理和生化标志物预测小于胎龄儿的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):52-61. doi: 10.1002/uog.23523. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by maternal factors, fetal biometry, and biomarkers at 35-37 weeks' gestation.预测小于胎龄儿:孕 35-37 周时通过母体因素、胎儿生物测量和生物标志物进行筛查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):486.e1-486.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.227. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.32 周与 36 周常规超声检查:预测小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from estimated fetal weight at 19-24 weeks' gestation.19-24 孕周估计胎儿体重预测小于胎龄儿的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):917-924. doi: 10.1002/uog.23593. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.在 35-37 孕周的常规超声检查中预测小于胎龄儿和不良围产结局的两阶段方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):484-491. doi: 10.1002/uog.20391. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in early third trimester.验证胎儿医学基金会竞争风险模型在孕晚期早期的小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;63(4):466-471. doi: 10.1002/uog.27498.
10
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks.小于胎龄儿的预测:孕30 - 34周时通过生物物理和生化标志物进行筛查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):446-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.14863. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation and comparison of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in the first trimester: multicenter cohort study.孕早期小于胎龄儿的胎儿医学基金会竞争风险模型的外部验证与比较:多中心队列研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1002/uog.29219.
2
Routine 36-week scan: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate.常规36周扫描:预测小于胎龄儿
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;65(1):20-29. doi: 10.1002/uog.29134. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Perinatal outcomes after selective third-trimester ultrasound screening for small-for-gestational age: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.
孕晚期选择性超声筛查小于胎龄儿后的围产期结局:DESiGN随机对照试验中的前瞻性队列研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;65(1):30-38. doi: 10.1002/uog.29130. Epub 2024 Nov 25.