• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子健康记录为慢性疼痛开具处方干预措施(PRINCE):研究方案。

PRescribing Interventions for Chronic pain using the Electronic health record (PRINCE): Study protocol.

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;121:106905. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106905. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106905
PMID:36057376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11729458/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care is a frequent source of pain treatment and opioid prescribing. The objective of the Prescribing Interventions for Chronic Pain using the Electronic health record (PRINCE) study is to assess the effects of two behavioral economics-informed interventions embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) on guideline-concordant pain treatment and opioid prescribing decisions in primary care settings.

METHODS

Setting: The setting for this study is 43 primary care clinics in Minnesota.

DESIGN

The PRINCE study uses a cluster-randomized 2 × 2 factorial design to test the effects of two interventions. An adaptive design allows for the possibility of secondary randomization to test if interventions can be titrated while maintaining efficacy.

INTERVENTIONS

One intervention alters the "choice architecture" within the EHR to nudge clinicians toward non-opioid treatments for opioid-naïve patients and toward tapering for patients currently receiving a "high risk" opioid. The other intervention integrates the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) directly within the EHR.

OUTCOME

The primary outcome for opioid-naïve patients is whether an opioid is prescribed in a primary care visit without a non-opioid alternative pain treatment. The primary outcome for current opioid-using patients is whether opioid prescriptions were tapered with a documented rationale.

DISCUSSION

The PRINCE study will provide real-world evidence on two approaches to improving pain treatment in primary care using the EHR. The adaptive study design strikes a balance between establishing intervention efficacy and testing whether efficacy varies with intervention intensity.

摘要

背景

初级保健是疼痛治疗和阿片类药物处方的主要来源。使用电子健康记录(PRINCE)进行慢性疼痛处方干预研究的目的是评估两种行为经济学指导的干预措施在电子健康记录(EHR)中对符合指南的疼痛治疗和阿片类药物处方决策的影响,这些干预措施在初级保健环境中。

方法

设置:本研究的设置是明尼苏达州的 43 个初级保健诊所。

设计

PRINCE 研究采用了集群随机 2×2 析因设计来测试两种干预措施的效果。适应性设计允许进行二次随机化的可能性,以测试干预措施是否可以在保持疗效的同时进行滴定。

干预措施

一种干预措施改变了 EHR 中的“选择架构”,以促使临床医生为阿片类药物初治患者选择非阿片类药物治疗,并为当前接受“高风险”阿片类药物的患者选择减少剂量。另一种干预措施将处方药物监测计划(PDMP)直接集成到 EHR 中。

结果

对于阿片类药物初治患者,主要结果是在初级保健就诊时是否开了阿片类药物而没有非阿片类替代疼痛治疗。对于当前使用阿片类药物的患者,主要结果是开阿片类药物处方是否减少,并附有记录的理由。

讨论

PRINCE 研究将提供使用 EHR 改善初级保健中疼痛治疗的两种方法的真实世界证据。适应性研究设计在确定干预效果和测试效果是否随干预强度而变化之间取得了平衡。

相似文献

1
PRescribing Interventions for Chronic pain using the Electronic health record (PRINCE): Study protocol.使用电子健康记录为慢性疼痛开具处方干预措施(PRINCE):研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;121:106905. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106905. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
2
Effect of Integrating Access to a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Within the Electronic Health Record on the Frequency of Queries by Primary Care Clinicians: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.电子病历中整合处方药物监测项目对初级保健临床医生查询频率的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 5;3(6):e221852. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1852. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Effect of an Electronic Health Record "Nudge" on Opioid Prescribing and Electronic Health Record Keystrokes in Ambulatory Care.电子健康记录“提示”对门诊护理中阿片类药物处方和电子健康记录按键操作的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06276-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
The protocol of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1 (AESOPS-1): Electronic health record nudges.经济学与社会心理学在提高阿片类药物处方安全试验 1(AESOPS-1)中的应用方案:电子健康记录提示。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106329. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Assessment of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Before and After Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.评估实施强制性处方药物监测计划前后的术后阿片类药物处方。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 1;2(10):e212924. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2924. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Opioid prescribing for chronic musculoskeletal pain in UK primary care: results from a cohort analysis of the COPERS trial.英国初级医疗中慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的阿片类药物处方:COPERS试验队列分析结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 6;8(6):e019491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019491.
7
Association of Default Electronic Medical Record Settings With Health Care Professional Patterns of Opioid Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Quality Improvement Study.默认电子病历设置与急诊医护人员阿片类药物处方模式的关联:一项随机质量改进研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):487-493. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6544.
8
Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改变电子健康记录阿片类镇痛药配给数量默认值对处方数量的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7481.
9
Implementation of Electronic Health Record Integration and Clinical Decision Support to Improve Emergency Department Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use.实施电子健康记录整合与临床决策支持以改善急诊科处方药监测计划的使用情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;83(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
10
Design of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial comparing the effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for voluntary opioid tapering: The INSPIRE study protocol.多中心随机对照试验设计,比较共享决策与动机访谈加认知行为疗法对自愿阿片类药物逐渐减量的效果:INSPIRE 研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Feb;137:107410. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107410. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive interventions for opioid prescription management and consumption monitoring.阿片类药物处方管理和使用监测的适应性干预。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Feb 16;30(3):511-528. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac253.
2
Effect of Integrating Access to a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Within the Electronic Health Record on the Frequency of Queries by Primary Care Clinicians: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.电子病历中整合处方药物监测项目对初级保健临床医生查询频率的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 5;3(6):e221852. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1852. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect Of Clinician Feedback Interventions On Opioid Prescribing.临床医生反馈干预对阿片类药物处方的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Mar;41(3):424-433. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01407.
2
Racial Inequality in Prescription Opioid Receipt - Role of Individual Health Systems.处方阿片类药物使用中的种族不平等——个体医疗系统的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 22;385(4):342-351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2034159.
3
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Mandates and Opioids Dispensed Following Emergency Department Encounters for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease or Cancer With Bone Metastasis.
处方药物监测计划的要求和癌症伴骨转移的镰状细胞病患者急诊后开出的阿片类药物。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 20;326(3):274-276. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10161.
4
Provider Compliance With Kentucky's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program's Mandate To Query Patient Opioid History.医疗机构对肯塔基州药品监测计划查询患者阿片类药物使用史要求的遵从情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):461-468. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01316.
5
Abrupt Discontinuation of Long-term Opioid Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 2012-2017.2012-2017 年间,医疗保险受益人的长期阿片类药物治疗的突然中断。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1576-1583. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06402-z. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
6
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Treatment of Chronic Pain.种族和民族差异与慢性疼痛的治疗。
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 4;22(1):75-90. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa427.
7
The state of the science in opioid policy research.阿片类药物政策研究的科学现状。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Sep 1;214:108137. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108137. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
8
Evaluation of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Integration With Hospital Electronic Health Records by US County-Level Opioid Prescribing Rates.评估美国县一级阿片类药物处方率的处方药物监测计划与医院电子健康记录的整合情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e209085. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9085.
9
Association of Default Electronic Medical Record Settings With Health Care Professional Patterns of Opioid Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Quality Improvement Study.默认电子病历设置与急诊医护人员阿片类药物处方模式的关联:一项随机质量改进研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):487-493. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6544.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of acute pain in US emergency departments: Meta-analysis and systematic review.美国急诊部门急性疼痛管理中的种族和民族差异:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1770-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 5.