Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas Cancer Center, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Dec;57(12):1758-1764. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01565-1. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
Donor selection may contribute to improve clinical outcomes of T cell-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Impact of second-degree related donor (SRD) was not fully elucidated in this platform. We retrospectively compared the outcome of patients receiving Haplo-SCT either from a SRD (n = 31) or a first-degree related donor (FRD, n = 957). Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery did not differ between a SRD and a FRD transplant (p = 0.599 and 0.587). Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus host disease (GVHD) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 13% and 19% after SRD vs 24% (p = 0.126) and 13% (p = 0.395) after FRD transplant. One-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19% for SRD and 20% for FRD (p = 0.435) cohort. The 3-year probability of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 42% vs 55% (p = 0.273) and 49% vs 35% (p = 0.280) after SRD and FRD transplant, respectively. After propensity score adjustment or matched pair analysis, the outcome of patients receiving Haplo-SCT from a SRD or a FRD did not differ in terms of NRM, OS, PFS, acute and chronic GVHD. Our results suggest that a SRD is a viable option for Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy when a FRD is not available.
供者选择可能有助于改善移植后环磷酰胺(PT-Cy)的 T 细胞充足的单倍体相合干细胞移植(Haplo-SCT)的临床结果。在这个平台上,二级相关供者(SRD)的影响尚未完全阐明。我们回顾性比较了接受来自 SRD(n=31)或一级相关供者(FRD,n=957)的 Haplo-SCT 的患者的结果。SRD 和 FRD 移植之间中性粒细胞和血小板恢复的中位时间没有差异(p=0.599 和 0.587)。SRD 后 II-IV 级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)和中重度慢性 GVHD 的累积发生率为 13%和 19%,而 FRD 后分别为 24%(p=0.126)和 13%(p=0.395)。SRD 的 1 年累积非复发死亡率(NRM)为 19%,FRD 为 20%(p=0.435)。SRD 和 FRD 移植后 3 年总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的概率分别为 42%和 55%(p=0.273)和 49%和 35%(p=0.280)。在进行倾向评分调整或匹配对分析后,接受来自 SRD 或 FRD 的 Haplo-SCT 的患者在 NRM、OS、PFS、急性和慢性 GVHD 方面的结果没有差异。当无法获得 FRD 时,SRD 是接受带 PT-Cy 的 Haplo-SCT 的可行选择。