Suppr超能文献

腰痛患者对护理路径的看法:一项定性研究。

Patient perspectives of care pathways for people with low back pain: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Boyle Eileen M, Fary Robyn E, Lee Samantha, Mikhailov Anton, Evans Kerrie, Rebbeck Trudy, Beales Darren J

机构信息

Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102657. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102657. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) care pathways aim to enhance health outcomes through patient-clinician mutual decision-making and care coordination. However, challenges to successful translation into practice include patients' understanding, expectation, and acceptance of treatment and management strategies for LBP. This study explored patients' perspectives and/or experience of care pathways and their involvement in decision-making in primary care.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 participants with LBP recruited from the community. Inductive thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted within the design framework to enable a systematic comparison of experiences across participants and within individual cases.

RESULTS

Five themes described participant perspectives and understanding of care pathways: i) care pathways can guide decision-making; ii) familiarity with no and/or stepped care pathway, but preference for matched or blend of care pathways; iii) engaging in shared decision-making; iv) patient-related barriers to implementation; v) patient-related facilitators to implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants felt that existing care pathways did not meet their needs when pain persisted. Participants preferred matched or hybrid care pathways and suggested that implementation of such pathways should focus on addressing an individual's needs. Adopting a holistic approach, and clarity in shared decision-making, were deemed crucial for effective implementation of LBP pathways in practice. Consumer (patient) engagement in the design of LBP care pathways is recommended.

摘要

背景

腰痛(LBP)护理路径旨在通过患者与临床医生的共同决策和护理协调来改善健康结果。然而,成功转化为实际应用面临的挑战包括患者对LBP治疗和管理策略的理解、期望和接受程度。本研究探讨了患者对护理路径的看法和/或体验,以及他们在初级护理中参与决策的情况。

方法

采用定性描述性设计。对从社区招募的14名腰痛患者进行了半结构化访谈。在设计框架内对定性数据进行归纳主题分析,以便对不同参与者和个别案例的经历进行系统比较。

结果

五个主题描述了参与者对护理路径的看法和理解:i)护理路径可指导决策;ii)对非阶梯式护理路径不熟悉和/或熟悉,但更喜欢匹配或混合的护理路径;iii)参与共同决策;iv)与患者相关的实施障碍;v)与患者相关的实施促进因素。

结论

参与者认为,当疼痛持续时,现有的护理路径无法满足他们的需求。参与者更喜欢匹配或混合的护理路径,并建议此类路径的实施应侧重于满足个体需求。采用整体方法以及在共同决策中保持清晰明确,被认为对在实践中有效实施腰痛护理路径至关重要。建议让消费者(患者)参与腰痛护理路径的设计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验