Rojas-Garcia Juan
Department of Translation and Interpreting, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 18;13:847024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847024. eCollection 2022.
The description of named entities in terminological knowledge bases has never been addressed in any depth in terminology. Firm preconceptions, rooted in philosophy, about the only referential function of proper names have presumably led to disparage their inclusion in terminology resources, despite the relevance of named entities having been highlighted by prominent figures in the discipline of terminology. Scholars from different branches of linguistics depart from the conservative stance on proper names and have foregrounded the need for a novel approach, more linguistic than philosophical, to describing proper names. Therefore, this paper proposed a linguistic and terminological approach to the study of named entities when used in scientific discourse, with the purpose of representing them in EcoLexicon, an environmental knowledge base designed according to the premises of Frame-based Terminology. We focused more specifically on named rivers (or potamonyms) mentioned in a coastal engineering corpus. Inclusion of named entities in terminological knowledge bases requires analyzing the context that surrounds them in specialized texts because these contexts convey specialized knowledge about named entities. For the semantic representation of context, this paper thus analyzed the local syntactic and semantic contexts that surrounded potamonyms in coastal engineering texts and described the semantic annotation of the predicate-argument structure of sentences where a potamonym was mentioned. The semantic variables annotated were the following: (1) semantic category of the arguments; (2) semantic role of the arguments; (3) semantic relation between the arguments; and (4) lexical domain of the verbs. This method yielded valuable insight into the different semantic roles that named rivers played, the entities and processes that participated in the events educed by potamonyms through verbs, and how they all interacted. Furthermore, since arguments are specialized terms and verbs are relational constructs, the analysis of argument structure led to the construction of semantic networks that depicted specialized knowledge about named rivers. These conceptual networks were then used to craft the thematic description of potamonyms. Accordingly, the semantic network and the thematic description not only constituted the representation of a potamonym in EcoLexicon, but also allowed the geographic contextualization of specialized concepts in the terminological resource.
术语知识库中命名实体的描述在术语学中从未得到过深入探讨。源于哲学的坚定先入之见,即专名仅具有指称功能,大概导致了人们轻视将其纳入术语资源,尽管术语学领域的杰出人物已经强调了命名实体的相关性。来自语言学不同分支的学者背离了对专名的保守立场,突出了采用一种比哲学方法更具语言学色彩的新颖方法来描述专名的必要性。因此,本文提出了一种语言学和术语学方法,用于研究科学话语中使用的命名实体,目的是在根据基于框架的术语学前提设计的环境知识库EcoLexicon中对其进行表示。我们更具体地关注了海岸工程语料库中提到的命名河流(或河名)。将命名实体纳入术语知识库需要分析它们在专业文本中的上下文,因为这些上下文传达了关于命名实体的专业知识。因此,为了对上下文进行语义表示,本文分析了海岸工程文本中围绕河名的局部句法和语义上下文,并描述了提及河名的句子的谓词-论元结构的语义标注。标注的语义变量如下:(1)论元的语义类别;(2)论元的语义角色;(3)论元之间的语义关系;(4)动词的词汇领域。这种方法为命名河流所扮演的不同语义角色、通过动词由河名引发的事件中参与的实体和过程以及它们之间的相互作用提供了有价值的见解。此外,由于论元是专业术语,动词是关系结构,对论元结构的分析导致构建了描绘关于命名河流的专业知识的语义网络。然后,这些概念网络被用于制作河名的主题描述。因此,语义网络和主题描述不仅构成了EcoLexicon中河名的表示,还使术语资源中的专业概念能够进行地理语境化。