Udroiu Cosmin-Mihai, Mota-Babiloni Adrián, Navarro-Esbrí Joaquín
ISTENER Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, E-12071, Spain.
Energy Convers Manag. 2022 Sep 1;267:115907. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115907. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, some vaccines have been developed requiring ultralow-temperature refrigeration, and the number of these freezers has been increased worldwide. Ultralow-temperature refrigeration operates with a significant temperature lift and, hence, a massive decrease in energy performance. Therefore, cascade cycles based on two vapor compression single-stage cycles are traditionally used for these temperatures. This paper proposes the combination of six different cycles (single-stage with and without internal heat exchanger, vapor injection, liquid injection, and parallel compression with and without economizer) in two-stage cascades to analyze the operational and energy performance in ultralow-temperature freezers. All this leads to 42 different configurations in which the intermediate cascade temperature is optimized to maximize the coefficient of performance. Ultra-low global warming potential natural refrigerants such as R-290 (propane) and R-170 (ethane) for the cascade high- and low-temperature stage have been considered. From the thermodynamic analysis, it can be concluded that liquid and vapor injection cascade configurations are the most energy-efficient. More specifically, those containing a vapor injection in the low-temperature stage (0.89 coefficient of performance, 40 % higher than traditional configurations). Then, using an internal heat exchanger for such low temperatures is unnecessary in terms of energy performance. The optimum intermediate cascade temperature varies significantly among cycles, from -37 °C to 2 °C, substantially impacting energy performance. Parallel compression configuration improves energy performance over single-stage cycles, but not as much as multi-stage (between 20 % and 30 % lower coefficient of performance). For most of low-temperature cycles, the high-temperature stage can be based on a single-stage cycle while keeping the maximum coefficient of performance.
为应对新冠疫情,已研发出一些需要超低温冷藏的疫苗,全球此类冰柜的数量也有所增加。超低温冷藏运行时温度提升幅度很大,因此能源效率大幅降低。所以,传统上针对这些温度采用基于两个蒸汽压缩单级循环的复叠循环。本文提出在两级复叠中组合六种不同循环(带和不带内部热交换器的单级循环、蒸汽喷射、液体喷射以及带和不带节能器的并行压缩),以分析超低温冰柜的运行和能源性能。这导致42种不同配置,其中中间复叠温度经过优化以实现性能系数最大化。已考虑用于复叠高温和低温阶段的全球变暖潜能值超低的天然制冷剂,如R - 290(丙烷)和R - 170(乙烷)。从热力学分析可以得出,液体和蒸汽喷射复叠配置是最节能的。更具体地说,那些在低温阶段包含蒸汽喷射的配置(性能系数为0.89,比传统配置高40%)。那么,就能源性能而言,在如此低温下使用内部热交换器是不必要的。最佳中间复叠温度在各循环之间差异显著,从 - 37°C到2°C,对能源性能有重大影响。并行压缩配置比单级循环提高了能源性能,但不如多级循环(性能系数低20%至30%)。对于大多数低温循环,高温阶段可以基于单级循环,同时保持最大性能系数。