Ruscio Mirko Di, Cedola Marco, Mangone Manuela, Brighi Stefano
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "Fabrizio Spaziani" Hospital, Frosinone, Italy (Mirko Di Ruscio, Marco Cedola, Manuela Mangone, Stefano Brighi).
Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep-Oct;35(5):462-470. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0732. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Endoscopic remission currently represents an important therapeutic goal to reach in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The diagnostic and prognostic role of endoscopy, which remains the gold standard for the assessment of disease activity, has been widely reported. Despite being unvalidated and suboptimal at measuring remission, the most widely used scoring system is the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). The UC Endoscopic Index of Severity and the UC Colonoscopic Index of Severity represent recent performing indices for the assessment of endoscopic disease activity in the field of white-light endoscopy. However, their use is still very limited, both in trials and clinical practice. The most recent Paddington international virtual chromoendoscopy score was the first validated index to assess vascular and mucosal features in UC using a virtual chromoendoscopy technique and showed good performance. This narrative review aims to describe these validated endoscopic scoring indices, focusing on the development methodology, and the strengths and weaknesses of each one in comparison with the MES for the assessment of UC activity.
内镜缓解目前是溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者管理中要达成的一个重要治疗目标。内镜检查作为评估疾病活动度的金标准,其诊断和预后作用已有广泛报道。尽管在衡量缓解方面未经证实且不够理想,但使用最广泛的评分系统是梅奥内镜亚评分(MES)。UC内镜严重程度指数和UC结肠镜严重程度指数是白光内镜领域评估内镜疾病活动度的最新实用指数。然而,它们在试验和临床实践中的应用仍然非常有限。最新的帕丁顿国际虚拟染色内镜评分是首个使用虚拟染色内镜技术评估UC血管和黏膜特征的经过验证的指数,且表现良好。本叙述性综述旨在描述这些经过验证的内镜评分指数,重点关注其开发方法,以及与MES相比,各指数在评估UC活动度方面的优缺点。