Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia PO Montichiari, Via Boccalera 325018, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy.
Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01374-7. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Since its introduction, the minimally invasive treatment of groin hernias has become widely accepted as a viable alternative to open surgery. Still, the rates and reasons for its adoption vary highly among countries and the regions within a country. After almost thirty years since its introduction, its spread is still limited. The present study, conducted under the auspices of AGENAS (Italian National Agency for Regional Services), aims at giving a snapshot of the spreading of minimally invasive and robotic techniques for the treatment of groin hernia in Italy. This study is retrospective, with data covering the period from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2020. AGENAS provided data using the operation and diagnosis codes used at discharge and reported in the International Classification of Diseases 9th revision (ICD9 2002 version). Admissions performed on an outpatient basis, i.e., without an overnight stay of at least one night in hospital, were excluded. A total of 33,925 laparoscopic hernia repairs were performed during the considered period. Overall, a slight increase in the number of procedures performed was observed from 2015 to 2019, with a mean annual change of 8.60% (CI: 6.46-10.74; p < 0.0001). The number of laparoscopic procedures dropped in 2020, and when considering the whole period, the mean annual change was - 0.98% (CI: - 7.41-5.45; p < 0.0001). Urgent procedures ranged from 335 in 2015 to 508 in 2020 referring to absolute frequencies, and from 0.87% to 9.8% in relative frequencies of overall procedures in 2017 and 2020, respectively (mean = 4.51%; CI = 3.02%-6%; p < 0.001). The most relevant observation that could be made according to our analysis was that the adoption of the laparoscopic approach knew a slow but steady increase from 2015 onward.
自引入以来,微创治疗腹股沟疝已被广泛接受为开放式手术的可行替代方案。然而,其采用率和原因在国家和国家内部的地区之间差异很大。在引入近三十年后,其传播仍然有限。本研究在 AGENAS(意大利国家区域服务局)的主持下,旨在描绘意大利微创和机器人技术治疗腹股沟疝的传播情况。这项研究是回顾性的,数据涵盖了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间。AGENAS 使用出院时使用的操作和诊断代码以及国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD9 2002 版)报告的数据提供了数据。不包括门诊进行的住院治疗,即至少在医院过夜一晚的住院治疗。在考虑期间进行了总共 33925 例腹腔镜疝修补术。总体而言,从 2015 年到 2019 年,手术数量略有增加,平均年增长率为 8.60%(CI:6.46-10.74;p<0.0001)。2020 年腹腔镜手术数量下降,考虑到整个时期,平均年增长率为-0.98%(CI:-7.41-5.45;p<0.0001)。紧急手术数量从 2015 年的 335 例增加到 2020 年的 508 例,绝对值,以及从 2017 年和 2020 年分别占总手术的相对频率的 0.87%到 9.8%(平均值为 4.51%;CI:3.02%-6%;p<0.001)。根据我们的分析,最值得注意的观察结果是,腹腔镜方法的采用从 2015 年开始缓慢但稳定地增加。