• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述新泽西州石棉危害应急反应法(AHERA)合规情况:2008-2017 年。

Characterizing Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Compliance in New Jersey: 2008-2017.

机构信息

Consumer, Environmental and Occupational Health Service, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001549. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001549
PMID:36074796
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) became a law in 1986, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) was mandated to promulgate rules to regulate the inspection, management, and abatement of asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) in schools. This study describes 10 years (2008-2017) of AHERA compliance site inspection data conducted by the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH).

OBJECTIVES

To establish the level to which inspected NJ schools comply with AHERA regulations, to characterize compliance deficiencies including those that may lead to increased asbestos exposure risk to students and school employees, and to determine whether age, type, and geographic location of school impacted the likelihood of noncompliance.

DESIGN

Information collected during 456 unique inspections between 2008 and 2017 was analyzed.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Inspections were conducted at public and private schools in New Jersey. These included elementary, middle, and high schools, as well as charter and vocational/technical schools.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression modeling of 3 factors, school type, geographical region, and school age.

RESULTS

NJDOH inspectors found damage to friable ACBM in 50% (n = 229) of the schools and fiber release episodes in 27% of inspections (n = 121). The case of schools failing to attach warning labels on or immediately adjacent to ACBM was the most frequently noted compliance deficiency over the 10-year period. The modeling output showed that compliance was associated with the type of school and geographical region.

CONCLUSIONS

Inspected schools during the 10-year period were in serious noncompliance with AHERA regulations. This included deficiencies that demonstrate a potential exposure to asbestos such as missing ACBM in management plans, damaged ACBM, lack of protection of short-term workers and custodial staff, and the identification of fiber release episodes. Modeling results of specific school characteristics can help direct limited resources to mitigate potential asbestos exposures.

摘要

背景

《石棉危害紧急应对法案》(AHERA)于 1986 年成为法律,美国环保署(USEPA)被授权颁布规定,以规范学校含石棉建筑材料(ACBM)的检查、管理和减少。本研究描述了新泽西州卫生部(NJDOH)进行的 AHERA 合规现场检查数据的 10 年(2008-2017 年)。

目的

确定经检查的新泽西州学校遵守 AHERA 法规的程度,描述合规缺陷,包括可能导致学生和学校员工暴露于石棉风险增加的缺陷,并确定学校的年龄、类型和地理位置是否影响不合规的可能性。

设计

对 2008 年至 2017 年期间进行的 456 次独特检查中收集的信息进行了分析。

设置和参与者

在新泽西州的公立和私立学校进行了检查。这些学校包括小学、中学和高中,以及特许和职业/技术学校。

主要结果测量

对学校类型、地理位置和学校年龄 3 个因素进行描述性统计和多逻辑回归建模。

结果

NJDOH 检查员发现,50%(n=229)的学校存在易碎 ACBM 损坏,27%的检查(n=121)中存在纤维释放事件。在过去 10 年中,最常注意到的合规缺陷是学校未能在 ACBM 上或紧邻 ACBM 处贴上警告标签。模型输出显示,合规性与学校类型和地理位置有关。

结论

在 10 年期间进行检查的学校严重违反了 AHERA 法规。这包括缺乏石棉管理计划中的 ACBM、损坏的 ACBM、缺乏对短期工人和保管人员的保护以及纤维释放事件的识别等潜在暴露的缺陷。对特定学校特征的建模结果可以帮助指导有限的资源,以减轻潜在的石棉暴露。

相似文献

1
Characterizing Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Compliance in New Jersey: 2008-2017.描述新泽西州石棉危害应急反应法(AHERA)合规情况:2008-2017 年。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001549. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
2
Teachers Union Organizes Members to Enforce AHERA Law--A Work in Progress.教师工会组织成员执行《石棉危害紧急反应法》——一项正在进行的工作。
New Solut. 2016 May;26(1):72-82. doi: 10.1177/1048291115623056. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
3
Products liability issues in school asbestos litigation.
Am J Law Med. 1985 Winter;10(4):467-89.
4
Asbestos in New York City public school buildings--public policy: is there a scientific basis?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;20(2):161-9. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1994.1067.
5
Asbestos in public hospitals: are employees at risk?公立医院中的石棉:员工面临风险吗?
J Environ Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;74(6):22-6.
6
Mesothelioma among employees with likely contact with in-place asbestos-containing building materials.可能接触过就地含石棉建筑材料的员工中的间皮瘤。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991 Dec 31;643:550-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb24506.x.
7
Environmental management criteria, aimed at public policymaking, for the removal and disposal of asbestos-containing building materials in Colombia.针对哥伦比亚公共政策制定的含石棉建筑材料移除和处置的环境管理标准。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023 Jul;19(4):1079-1088. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4736. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
8
A radiographic survey of public school building maintenance and custodial employees.一项针对公立学校建筑维护和 custodial 员工的放射学调查。 (注:“custodial”常见释义为“保管的;监护的; custodial employee 可理解为负责保管、维护等工作的员工,这里结合语境意译为后勤员工 )
Environ Res. 1992 Oct;59(1):159-66. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80236-1.
9
Human health risks associated with asbestos abatement.与石棉清除相关的人类健康风险。
Risk Anal. 1991 Sep;11(3):465-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00632.x.
10
COVID-19 School vs. Community-Based Outbreak Trends among New Jersey K-12 Schools during the 2020-2021 School Year.2020-2021 学年新泽西州 K-12 学校中 COVID-19 的校内与社区暴发趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):9285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159285.