Chu Po-Yu, Chen Yi-Fan, Li Cheng-Yuan, Wang Tien-Hsiang, Chiu Yu-Jen, Ma Hsu
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2023 Jan 1;86(1):72-79. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000809. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is the predominant prognostic factor in patients diagnosed with clinically localized melanoma. The significance of completion lymph node dissection in patients with SLN metastasis is debatable. Not many studies have been conducted on acrallentiginous melanoma (ALM). This study aimed to characterize the prognostic factors of nodal positive ALM and confirm whether ALM patients can undergo the same treatment strategy as non-ALM patients in the Asian population.
This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for cutaneous melanoma (CM) at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 1993 and December 2019. We investigated the risk factors for lymph node status. The association between clinicopathological factors and lymph node status of ALM and non-ALM patients was analyzed. Outcomes of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) performed following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the CM and ALM groups were compared.
A total of 197 patients were included in this study. ALM was the most common histological subtype, accounting for 66.5% of all the cases. Patients in the CM and ALM subgroups with metastatic SLN ( p = 0.012) or lymph nodes ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.001) exhibited higher mortality rate. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with clinical presentation of T4 category tumor ( p = 0.012) and lymphovascular invasion ( p = 0.012) had a significantly higher risk of positive lymph nodes. The overall survival of patients with lymph nodes metastasis was not associated with the performance of CLND.
Patients in the CM or ALM subgroups with metastatic SLNs or lymph nodes exhibited significantly poorer overall survival. Advanced Breslow thickness and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictive factors for CM and ALM patients with positive lymph node status. There was no significant difference in survival between CM and ALM patients following SLNB, regardless of CLND being performed.
前哨淋巴结(SLN)状态是临床局限性黑色素瘤患者的主要预后因素。前哨淋巴结转移患者行根治性淋巴结清扫术的意义存在争议。关于肢端雀斑样痣黑色素瘤(ALM)的研究不多。本研究旨在明确淋巴结阳性ALM的预后因素,并确认亚洲人群中ALM患者是否可采用与非ALM患者相同的治疗策略。
这是一项对1993年1月至2019年12月在台北荣民总医院接受皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)手术患者的回顾性研究。我们调查了淋巴结状态的危险因素。分析了ALM和非ALM患者的临床病理因素与淋巴结状态之间的关联。比较了CM组和ALM组在前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)后进行根治性淋巴结清扫(CLND)的结果。
本研究共纳入197例患者。ALM是最常见的组织学亚型,占所有病例的66.5%。CM亚组和ALM亚组中前哨淋巴结转移(p = 0.012)或淋巴结转移(p < 0.001和p = 0.001)的患者死亡率较高。多因素分析显示,临床表现为T4期肿瘤(p = 0.012)和淋巴管侵犯(p = 0.012)的患者淋巴结阳性风险显著更高。淋巴结转移患者的总生存期与CLND的实施无关。
CM亚组或ALM亚组中前哨淋巴结或淋巴结转移的患者总生存期明显较差。Breslow厚度增加和淋巴管侵犯是CM和ALM患者淋巴结阳性状态的独立预测因素。SLNB后CM和ALM患者的生存率无显著差异,无论是否进行CLND。