Hajek André, Nedjad MiladAhmad, Kretzler Benedikt, König Hans-Helmut
Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Jan;85(1):26-35. doi: 10.1055/a-1916-9895. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
There is a lack of knowledge regarding utilization of and attitudes towards tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany. Our work aimed to reduce this gap.
Data were taken from a nationally representative online survey (August 24th to 3rd September 2021, n=3,075; mean age: 44.5 years). Utilization of and attitudes toward Covid-19-tests were quantified in detail.
In sum, 79.1% of respondents had already undergone an appropriate test to detect SARS-CoV-2 test (mainly rapid antigen testing at rapid testing centers and self-testing) or an antibody test. With the exception of a PCR test, Covid-19 tests were rarely perceived as uncomfortable. Respondents were most likely to prefer a rapid antigen test in a rapid testing center. The main reasons for using self-testing as well as rapid antigen testing at rapid testing centers were (i) protection of others, (ii) for their own health precautions, and (iii) traveling. The main reasons for not using self-testing/rapid antigen testing at the workplace/training center were: (i) already vaccinated against Covid-19/recovered from Covid-19, followed by (ii) the home office workplace, and (iii) a lack of perceived benefit. Nearly 80% were somewhat or very satisfied, with access to testing at the workplace/training center and rapid testing centers.
Our work described the use of and aspects of attitudes toward tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany in late summer 2021. At that time, such test offers were already used quite often and were predominantly perceived as not being very unpleasant. The protection of other individuals was one of the main reasons for the use of such tests. Future research in this area is desirable (e. g., among the oldest old and in times when free-of-charge testing is no longer offered).
德国在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测试验的利用情况和态度方面存在知识欠缺。我们的工作旨在缩小这一差距。
数据取自一项具有全国代表性的在线调查(2021年8月24日至9月3日,n = 3075;平均年龄:44.5岁)。详细量化了对2019冠状病毒病检测试验的利用情况和态度。
总体而言,79.1%的受访者已经接受过检测SARS-CoV-2的适当检测(主要是在快速检测中心进行的快速抗原检测和自我检测)或抗体检测。除了聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测外,2019冠状病毒病检测很少被认为不舒服。受访者最倾向于在快速检测中心进行快速抗原检测。在快速检测中心进行自我检测和快速抗原检测的主要原因是:(i)保护他人,(ii)出于自身健康预防措施,以及(iii)旅行。不在工作场所/培训中心进行自我检测/快速抗原检测的主要原因是:(i)已经接种过2019冠状病毒病疫苗/已从2019冠状病毒病中康复,其次是(ii)居家办公的工作场所,以及(iii)认为没有益处。近80%的人对在工作场所/培训中心和快速检测中心进行检测的机会有些或非常满意。
我们的工作描述了2021年夏末德国SARS-CoV-2检测试验的使用情况和态度方面。当时,此类检测服务已经被频繁使用,并且大多被认为不是很令人不适。保护其他个体是使用此类检测的主要原因之一。该领域未来的研究是有必要的(例如,在高龄人群中以及不再提供免费检测的时候)。