Orrason Andri Wilberg, Styrke Johan, Garmo Hans, Stattin Pär
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
BJU Int. 2023 Apr;131(4):486-493. doi: 10.1111/bju.15891. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
To assess the strength of the evidence indicative of prostate cancer (PCa) progression as the adjudicated cause of death, according to age at death and PCa risk category.
Using data from the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden, we identified a study frame of 5543 men with PCa registered as the cause of death according to the Cause of Death Register. We assessed the evidence of PCa progression through a review of healthcare records for a stratified sample of 495/5543. We extracted data on prostate-specific antigen levels, presence of metastases on imaging, and PCa treatments, and quantified the evidence of disease progression using a points system.
Both no evidence and moderate evidence for PCa progression was more common in men aged >85 years at death than those aged <85 years (29% vs 14%). Among the latter, the proportion with no evidence or moderate evidence for PCa progression was 21% for low-risk, 14% for intermediate-risk, 8% for high-risk, and 0% for metastatic PCa. In contrast, in men aged >85 years, there was little difference in the proportion with no evidence or moderate evidence of PCa progression between PCa risk categories; 31% for low-risk, 29% for intermediate-risk, 29% for high-risk, and 21% for metastatic PCa. Of the 5543 men who died from PCa, 13% (95% confidence interval 5-19%) were estimated to have either no evidence or moderate evidence of PCa progression.
Weak evidence for PCa progression as cause of death was more common in older men with PCa and in those with low-risk PCa. This has implications for interpretation of mortality statistics especially when assessing screening and early treatment of PCa because the beneficial effect of earlier diagnosis could be masked by erroneous adjudication of PCa as cause of death in older men, particular those with localised disease at diagnosis.
根据死亡年龄和前列腺癌(PCa)风险类别,评估表明PCa进展为裁定死亡原因的证据强度。
利用瑞典前列腺癌数据库的数据,我们根据死亡原因登记册确定了一个5543名PCa患者的研究框架,这些患者登记的死亡原因是PCa。我们通过回顾495/5543分层样本的医疗记录来评估PCa进展的证据。我们提取了前列腺特异性抗原水平、影像学上转移灶的存在以及PCa治疗的数据,并使用评分系统对疾病进展的证据进行量化。
在死亡时年龄>85岁的男性中,无PCa进展证据和有中度PCa进展证据的情况比年龄<85岁的男性更常见(29%对14%)。在后者中,低风险患者无PCa进展证据或有中度PCa进展证据的比例为21%,中风险患者为14%,高风险患者为8%,转移性PCa患者为0%。相比之下,在年龄>85岁的男性中,不同PCa风险类别之间无PCa进展证据或有中度PCa进展证据的比例差异不大;低风险患者为31%,中风险患者为29%,高风险患者为29%,转移性PCa患者为21%。在5543名死于PCa的男性中,估计有13%(95%置信区间5-19%)无PCa进展证据或有中度PCa进展证据。
PCa进展作为死亡原因的证据薄弱在老年PCa患者和低风险PCa患者中更为常见。这对死亡率统计的解释有影响,特别是在评估PCa的筛查和早期治疗时,因为早期诊断的有益效果可能会被将PCa错误裁定为老年男性(特别是诊断时为局限性疾病的男性)的死亡原因所掩盖。