Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Nov 15;183:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
The role of digoxin in clinical practice has narrowed over time. Data on digoxin toxicity trends and outcomes are variable and lack granularity for treatment outcomes. This study aimed to address data gaps in digoxin toxicity trends and outcomes in patients treated with or without digoxin immune fab (DIF). This single-center analysis examined patients with signs/symptoms concerning digoxin toxicity, defined as hospital admission or emergency department visit with elevated digoxin serum concentrations (>2 ng/ml) and/or a primary diagnosis code of digoxin toxicity and/or DIF order. Between 2000 and 2020, 727 patients were identified with signs concerning for digoxin toxicity with a mortality rate of 12.7% during admission and 42.7% at 1 year. DIF was ordered in 9% of cases. Incidence of digoxin toxicity per 1,000 patients with a digoxin prescription and frequency of DIF treatment fluctuated over time without a clear trend toward increase or reduction. DIF-treated patients demonstrated a heavier co-morbidity burden and lower presenting heart rates (median 53 [39.5 to 69.5] vs 77 [64.0 to 91.5] beats/min, p <0.001), worse renal function (median estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30.3 [14.8 to 48.6] vs 40.0 [24.2 to 61.2] ml/min/1.73 m, p = 0.013), and higher potassium (median 4.5 [4.0 to 5.3] vs 4.3 [3.9 to 4.8] mEq/L, p = 0.022). Compared with a matched cohort, DIF-treated patients experienced a nonsignificant, numerically lower in-hospital mortality (8.2% vs 15.8%, p = 0.199) and 30-day all-cause hospitalization (14.3% vs 24.7%, p = 0.112) and similar 6-month and 1-year hospitalization and mortality. In conclusion, digoxin toxicity remains a pertinent public health issue despite reduction in digoxin utilization. DIF therapy is used in a medically complex population with a high-acuity illness at presentation and is associated with nonsignificant trends toward reduced in-hospital mortality and early readmission that are attenuated over time.
地高辛在临床实践中的作用已经随着时间的推移而缩小。关于地高辛毒性趋势和结果的数据是可变的,并且缺乏治疗结果的粒度。本研究旨在解决接受或未接受地高辛免疫 Fab(DIF)治疗的患者中地高辛毒性趋势和结果的数据空白。这项单中心分析检查了有地高辛毒性体征/症状的患者,定义为因地高辛血清浓度升高(>2ng/ml)和/或主要诊断代码为地高辛毒性和/或 DIF 订单而住院或急诊就诊的患者。在 2000 年至 2020 年间,共确定了 727 例有地高辛毒性体征的患者,住院期间死亡率为 12.7%,1 年时死亡率为 42.7%。9%的病例中开具了 DIF 医嘱。每千名有地高辛处方的患者中地高辛毒性的发生率和 DIF 治疗的频率随时间波动,但没有明显的增加或减少趋势。接受 DIF 治疗的患者表现出更严重的合并症负担和更低的初始心率(中位数为 53[39.5 至 69.5]比 77[64.0 至 91.5]次/分钟,p<0.001),肾功能更差(中位数估算肾小球滤过率,30.3[14.8 至 48.6]比 40.0[24.2 至 61.2]ml/min/1.73m,p=0.013),血钾更高(中位数 4.5[4.0 至 5.3]比 4.3[3.9 至 4.8]mEq/L,p=0.022)。与匹配队列相比,接受 DIF 治疗的患者住院期间死亡率(8.2%比 15.8%,p=0.199)和 30 天全因住院率(14.3%比 24.7%,p=0.112)以及相似的 6 个月和 1 年住院率和死亡率均无统计学意义,但数值较低。总之,尽管地高辛的使用减少了,但地高辛毒性仍然是一个相关的公共卫生问题。DIF 治疗用于具有高发病率疾病的医疗复杂人群,与住院期间死亡率和早期再入院率呈下降趋势相关,但随着时间的推移,这种趋势减弱。