Ge Wei, Gong Hai-Yan, Shao Li-Hua, Chen Gang, Qiu Yu-Dong
Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Aug;13(4):1746-1752. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-545.
For patients with rectal and sigmoid colon cancer, dissecting No. 253 lymph nodes and preserving the left colic artery are the essentials of radical surgery. In clinical work, some surgeons prefer to dissect lymph nodes with skeletonization, believing that lymph nodes can be dissected completely by this method, while other surgeons prefer to dissect lymph nodes with venation. They believe that their method can not only dissect lymph nodes completely but also ensure the safety of patients. This study aimed to investigate whether lymphadenectomy with skeletonization is superior to lymphadenectomy with venation for patients with rectal and sigmoid colon cancer.
We performed a retrospective cohort study between August, 2017 and October, 2019 at the Department of General Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. The inclusion criteria were as follows: diagnosed as rectum or sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma by electronic colonoscopy and histopathology; 18-80 years of age; underwent radical resection. The exclusion criteria were as follows: received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery; combined with distant metastasis. According to the method of lymph node dissection, patients were divided into the skeletonization group and venation group. We then compared the curative effect and safety between the 2 groups.
A total of 211 patients were recruited in this retrospective study and assigned as follows: 62 cases to the skeletonization group and 149 patients to the venation group. There were no statistical differences in the total number of lymph nodes (P=0.082), number of positive lymph nodes (P=0.097), total number of No. 253 lymph nodes (P=0.096), number of positive No. 253 lymph nodes (P=0.813), and nodal staging (P=0.254) between the 2 groups. However, the amount of bleeding in the skeletonization group was significantly higher than that in the venation group (P≤0.001), and the operation time in the skeletonization group was also significantly longer than that in the venation group (P≤0.001).
Lymphadenectomy with venation is preferred in the radical resection of patients with rectal and sigmoid colon cancer.
对于直肠癌和乙状结肠癌患者,清扫第253组淋巴结并保留左结肠动脉是根治性手术的要点。在临床工作中,一些外科医生倾向于采用骨骼化方式清扫淋巴结,认为通过这种方法可以彻底清扫淋巴结,而另一些外科医生则倾向于采用脉络化方式清扫淋巴结。他们认为自己的方法不仅能彻底清扫淋巴结,还能确保患者的安全。本研究旨在探讨对于直肠癌和乙状结肠癌患者,骨骼化淋巴结清扫术是否优于脉络化淋巴结清扫术。
我们于2017年8月至2019年10月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院普通外科进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入标准如下:经电子结肠镜及组织病理学诊断为直肠或乙状结肠腺癌;年龄18 - 80岁;接受根治性切除术。排除标准如下:术前接受新辅助治疗;合并远处转移。根据淋巴结清扫方法,将患者分为骨骼化组和脉络化组。然后比较两组之间的疗效和安全性。
本回顾性研究共纳入211例患者,分组如下:骨骼化组62例,脉络化组149例。两组之间在淋巴结总数(P = 0.082)、阳性淋巴结数(P = 0.097)、第253组淋巴结总数(P = 0.096)、第253组阳性淋巴结数(P = 0.813)及淋巴结分期(P = 0.254)方面均无统计学差异。然而,骨骼化组的出血量显著高于脉络化组(P≤0.001),且骨骼化组的手术时间也显著长于脉络化组(P≤0.001)。
在直肠癌和乙状结肠癌患者的根治性切除术中,优先选择脉络化淋巴结清扫术。