Scorzoni Marco, Gonnella Gian Luigi, Capogna Emanuele, Velardo Matteo, Giuri Pietro Paolo, Ciancia Mariano, Capogna Giorgio, Draisci Gaetano
Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University Medical School-Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
European School of Obstetric Anesthesia, Roma, Italy.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2022 Sep 2;2022:1738783. doi: 10.1155/2022/1738783. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to investigate whether the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may affect the learning curve for lumbar epidural block in novice trainees when compared with a standard teaching module.
There is a paucity of literature regarding the efficacy of teaching epidural blocks and comparisons between the different educational approaches.
Forty-four PGY3 anesthesia trainees were randomized to receive (study group) or to not receive (control group) the SDM (structured didactic model) before the beginning of their 6 months clinical practice rotation in labor and delivery suites. A CUSUM learning curve was built for every trainee. The scores were assigned by the staff instructor, who was unaware of the group to which the trainee belonged.
The number of subjects who achieved an improvement in performance was 8 trainees from the control group and 14 from the study group. The probability of achieving an improvement was higher ( < 05) in the study group than in the control group, with an aOR of 3.25 (CI: 1.01; 12.1). The proportion of subjects in the study group who completed the epidural without help was 1.21 (1.05-1.41) times the proportion of subjects who completed the epidural without help in the control group. The probability of completing the epidural block without any assistance was 21% higher in the study group than in the control group ( < 05).
We have demonstrated that the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may improve the learning curve (CUSUM) for lumbar epidural block in novice, entirely inexperienced, anesthesia trainees.
本随机前瞻性研究旨在调查与标准教学模块相比,结构化硬膜外教学模型(SETM)的使用是否会影响新手学员腰段硬膜外阻滞的学习曲线。
关于硬膜外阻滞教学效果以及不同教学方法之间比较的文献较少。
44名PGY3麻醉学员在进入产房和分娩室进行6个月临床实习轮转前,被随机分为接受(研究组)或不接受(对照组)结构化讲授模型(SDM)。为每位学员绘制累积和学习曲线。分数由不了解学员所属组别的带教教员评定。
对照组有8名学员、研究组有14名学员的操作表现得到改善。研究组操作表现得到改善的概率高于对照组(P<0.05),调整后比值比为3.25(可信区间:1.01;12.1)。研究组中无需帮助即可完成硬膜外阻滞的学员比例是对照组中无需帮助即可完成硬膜外阻滞学员比例的1.21(1.05 - 1.41)倍。研究组无需任何协助即可完成硬膜外阻滞的概率比对照组高21%(P<0.05)。
我们已经证明,结构化硬膜外教学模型(SETM)的使用可能会改善完全没有经验的新手麻醉学员腰段硬膜外阻滞的学习曲线(累积和)。