Unsworth John, Greene Karen, Ali Parveen, Lillebø Gro, Mazilu Donia Carmen
Professor of Nursing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Deputy Chief Nursing Officer, Department of Health, Dublin, Ireland.
Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Jun;71(2):299-308. doi: 10.1111/inr.12800. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Advanced practice nursing (APN) roles offer improved access to care and increased quality and more timely care. Despite the advantages of APN roles, there is a disparity between European countries when it comes to implementing APN roles.
To explore the implementation of APN roles in a range of European countries and to explore what factors facilitate or hinder the implementation of these roles.
A case study evaluation of the process of implementing APN roles. The sample included four countries where APN roles were well developed (Ireland, Spain, Norway and the United Kingdom) and four where APN roles were implemented (Estonia, Slovenia, Cyprus and Romania). Interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 28) from government departments, regulatory bodies, nursing associations and universities. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (CPREQ) has been used throughout.
The small number of countries when considering the size of the region and key informants representing the view of only three to four people in each country.
Four themes were identified, including the rationale for the development of the roles, influence, the evolutionary nature of role development and evidence. The data also revealed a mismatch between the perceptions of how the roles develop among the different countries in the early stages of implementation.
Successful role implementation is dependent upon a tripartite approach between managers, practitioners and educators. An evolutionary approach to role development was used. Regulation and policy come later on in the process of implementation.
APN policy should be based on patient needs rather than on the workforce or professional imperatives. The process of implementation can take 15-20 years in total. Recognising the importance of the relationships between service managers and educators is key to the early development of these roles.
高级实践护理(APN)角色有助于改善医疗服务的可及性,提高医疗质量并使护理更加及时。尽管APN角色具有诸多优势,但在欧洲国家实施APN角色时仍存在差异。
探讨一系列欧洲国家中APN角色的实施情况,并探究哪些因素促进或阻碍了这些角色的实施。
对APN角色实施过程进行案例研究评估。样本包括四个APN角色发展良好的国家(爱尔兰、西班牙、挪威和英国)以及四个实施了APN角色的国家(爱沙尼亚、斯洛文尼亚、塞浦路斯和罗马尼亚)。对来自政府部门、监管机构、护理协会和大学的关键信息提供者(n = 28)进行了访谈。自始至终都采用了定性研究报告的综合标准(COREQ)。
考虑到该地区的规模,国家数量较少,且关键信息提供者仅代表每个国家三到四人的观点。
确定了四个主题,包括角色发展的基本原理、影响、角色发展的演变性质和证据。数据还显示,在实施的早期阶段,不同国家对角色发展方式的认知存在差异。
角色的成功实施取决于管理者、从业者和教育者之间的三方合作。采用了角色发展的渐进式方法。监管和政策在实施过程中稍后出现。
APN政策应基于患者需求,而非劳动力或专业要求。实施过程总共可能需要15至20年。认识到服务管理者与教育者之间关系的重要性是这些角色早期发展的关键。