School of Environmental Science and Engineering/ Tianjin Key lab of Biomass Waste Utilization, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Key Laboratory of Advanced Process Control for Light Industry, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Chemosphere. 2022 Dec;308(Pt 3):136389. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136389. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
Biochar (e.g. pyrochar and hydrochar) is considered a promising adsorbent for Cd removal from aqueous solution. Considering the vastly different physicochemical properties between pyrochar and hydrochar, the Cd sorption capacity and mechanisms of pyrochars and hydrochars should be comparatively determined to guide the production and application of biochar. In this study, the hydrochars and pyrochars were prepared from Napier grass by hydrothermal carbonization (200 and 240 °C) and pyrolysis (300 and 500 °C), respectively, and the physicochemical properties and Cd sorption performances of biochars were systematically determined. The pyrochars had higher pH and ash content as well as better stability, while the hydrochars showed more oxygen-containing functional groups (OFGs) and greater energy density. The pseudo second order kinetic model best fitted the Cd sorption kinetics data of biochars, and the isotherm data of pyrochar and hydrochar were well described by Langmuir and Freundlich models, respectively. In comparison with hydrochar, the pyrochar exhibited better Cd sorption capacity (up to 71.47 mg/g). With increasing production temperature, the Cd sorption capacity of pyrochar elevated, while the reduction was found for hydrochar. The mineral interaction, complexation with surface OFGs, and coordination with π electron were considered the main mechanisms of Cd removal by biochars. The minerals interaction and the complexation with OFGs was the dominant mechanism of Cd removal by pyrochars and hydrochars, respectively. Therefore, the preparation technique and temperature have significant impacts on the sorption capacity and mechanisms of biochar, and pyrochar has better potential for Cd removal than the congenetic hydrochar.
生物炭(例如热解炭和水热炭)被认为是一种很有前途的从水溶液中去除 Cd 的吸附剂。考虑到热解炭和水热炭之间存在着极大不同的物理化学性质,应比较确定热解炭和水热炭的 Cd 吸附能力和机制,以指导生物炭的生产和应用。在这项研究中,分别通过水热碳化(200 和 240°C)和热解(300 和 500°C),由象草制备了水热炭和热解炭,并系统地测定了生物炭的物理化学性质和 Cd 吸附性能。热解炭具有较高的 pH 值和灰分含量,以及更好的稳定性,而水热炭则具有更多的含氧官能团(OFGs)和更高的能量密度。准二级动力学模型最适合生物炭的 Cd 吸附动力学数据,而热解炭和水热炭的等温线数据分别很好地符合 Langmuir 和 Freundlich 模型。与水热炭相比,热解炭表现出更好的 Cd 吸附能力(高达 71.47mg/g)。随着生产温度的升高,热解炭的 Cd 吸附能力升高,而水热炭则降低。矿物相互作用、表面 OFGs 的络合以及与π电子的配位被认为是生物炭去除 Cd 的主要机制。矿物相互作用和 OFGs 的络合分别是热解炭和水热炭去除 Cd 的主要机制。因此,制备技术和温度对生物炭的吸附能力和机制有显著影响,热解炭比同源的水热炭更具有去除 Cd 的潜力。