Elaine Marieb College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 230 Skinner Hall, 651 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Tobin 628, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Jun;17(3):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01253-5. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
The scoping review aimed to map out the literature on the utilization of motivational interviewing (MI) to improve health behaviors (i.e., physical activity, nutrition) in adult cancer survivors.
This scoping review was conducted following the methods and protocol outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute Methods Manual. Five databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus, were searched in February 2022 to identify MI interventions to improve health behaviors among cancer survivors.
The review included 22 interventions mostly designed to optimize exercise/physical activity (50%). The number of sessions ranged from 2 to 19, and most MI sessions were offered via telephone calls combined with face-to-face sessions (31.8%). Of the interventions, 81.8% improved at least one outcome measurement. Most studies used principles of MI such as empathy expression, developing discrepancy, roll with resistance, and supporting self-efficacy.
The use of MI appears to have the potential to improve health behaviors in various settings for individuals on different cancer care trajectories.
Healthcare providers can use MI to support physical activity and a healthy diet. Future research should focus on providing evidence on the utilization of MI with minimum standards and longitudinal outcome assessment for developing and maintaining sustainable healthy behaviors.
本范围综述旨在绘制利用动机性访谈(MI)改善成年癌症幸存者健康行为(即体力活动、营养)的文献。
本范围综述按照 Joanna Briggs 研究所方法手册中概述的方法和方案进行。2022 年 2 月,我们在五个数据库(包括 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 SPORTDiscus)中进行了搜索,以确定 MI 干预措施,以改善癌症幸存者的健康行为。
综述包括 22 项干预措施,主要旨在优化运动/体力活动(50%)。疗程数从 2 次到 19 次不等,大多数 MI 疗程通过电话与面对面课程相结合(31.8%)。在这些干预措施中,81.8%的干预措施至少改善了一项结果测量。大多数研究都采用了 MI 的原则,如表达同理心、发现差异、顺应阻力和支持自我效能。
在不同的癌症护理轨迹中,针对不同个体的各种环境中,使用 MI 似乎具有改善健康行为的潜力。
医疗保健提供者可以使用 MI 来支持体力活动和健康饮食。未来的研究应重点关注提供 MI 利用的证据,包括最低标准和纵向结果评估,以开发和维持可持续的健康行为。