Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Oct;44(5):1114-1122. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
Transplant recipients undergo significant changes in their medication regimen during follow-up and are at an increased risk for medication-related problems (MRPs).
This study aimed to compare the prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist as well as the satisfaction with information about medicines and medication adherence.
We performed a single-center, observational cohort study. A retro- and prospective cohort were used and subdivided in a group that did and did not receive a medication consultation. The prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions were identified and categorized. The satisfaction parameters were evaluated using validated questionnaires.
Included were 291 patients. In total, 368 MRPs were identified in 197 patients in the non-medication consultation cohort (median 1; range 1-3 per patient) and 248 MRPs in 94 patients in the medication consultation cohort (median 2; range 1-4 per patient). In the medication consultation cohort, significantly fewer MRPs as unnecessary drugs (17.3% versus 58.7%, p < 0.001), suboptimal therapy (2.4% versus 9.5%, p < 0.001), untreated indication (2.8% versus 6.8%, p = 0.040) and underdosed drugs (0.4% versus 6.3%, p < 0.001) were identified. In the non-medication consultation cohort significantly more patients used unnecessary drugs (72.1% versus 39.4%, p < 0.001) compared to the medication consultation cohort. Patients in both cohorts are satisfied with the information about medicines and reported a high medication adherence.
Patients in the medication consultation cohort had significantly fewer MRPs and used significantly less unnecessary drugs. Including a clinical pharmacist to the post-transplant care has an added value.
移植受者在随访期间经历了药物治疗方案的重大变化,并且存在药物相关问题(MRP)的风险增加。
本研究旨在比较接受和不接受临床药师门诊药物咨询的肝移植受者的 MRP 发生率、类型以及干预措施,并比较他们对药物信息和药物依从性的满意度。
我们进行了一项单中心、观察性队列研究。使用回顾性和前瞻性队列,并分为接受和不接受药物咨询的两组。确定并分类了 MRP 的发生率和类型。使用经过验证的问卷评估满意度参数。
共纳入 291 例患者。在非药物咨询组的 197 例患者中,共发现 368 例 MRP(中位数为 1;范围为 1-3 例/例),而在药物咨询组的 94 例患者中,共发现 248 例 MRP(中位数为 2;范围为 1-4 例/例)。在药物咨询组中,不必要药物(17.3%对 58.7%,p<0.001)、治疗不充分(2.4%对 9.5%,p<0.001)、未治疗的适应证(2.8%对 6.8%,p=0.040)和剂量不足的药物(0.4%对 6.3%,p<0.001)的发生率明显更低。在非药物咨询组中,与药物咨询组相比,更多的患者使用了不必要的药物(72.1%对 39.4%,p<0.001)。两个队列的患者对药物信息都很满意,并报告了很高的药物依从性。
药物咨询组的患者 MRP 发生率明显更低,并且使用不必要的药物明显更少。将临床药师纳入移植后护理具有附加价值。