School of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Oct 1;128(4):1074-1084. doi: 10.1152/jn.00284.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
The perceived intensity of a vibrotactile stimulus is thought to depend on single-neuron firing rates (rate coding) and the number of active afferents (population coding). Unaddressed until now is whether the temporal relation of individual spikes also conveys information about tactile intensity. We used cutaneous electro-tactile stimulation to investigate how the temporal structure of a fixed number of spikes in a 1-s train influenced the perception of intensity. Four mean spike rates spanning the flutter and vibratory hum range (36 Hz, 60 Hz; 120 Hz, 180 Hz) were tested, with spikes grouped into a regular pattern, or bursts of 2-6 spikes spaced 3 ms apart. To link a putative neural code to perception, perceived intensity was assessed in 16 human participants (aged 20-45; 4 females) using the psychophysical paradigm of magnitude estimation. Compound sensory nerve action potentials were recorded to assess any stimulus variation in afferent recruitment. The temporal structuring of a fixed number of spikes into periodic bursts of multiple spikes altered perceived intensity as a function of burst spike count. The largest increase was seen at 36 Hz, where the bursts of six spikes were rated 2.1 times stronger than the regularly spaced spikes [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-2.3]. The true increase is likely larger as temporal structuring of spikes into bursts had some negative effect on afferent recruitment. We conclude that the perceived intensity can be modulated by changing temporal features of afferent discharge even when normalized for the number of recruited afferents. Structuring a fixed number of spikes into temporal burst patterns evoke gradations of perceived intensity with burst spike count, emphasizing the importance of spike timing in primary afferents for shaping perception. This forms the basis for new strategies in communicating a range of intensity information to users of neural interfaces by simply varying the timing of spikes in nonspecific primary afferents using fixed-charge electric pulses, without requiring alterations in stimulation current or mean pulse frequency.
触觉刺激的感知强度被认为取决于单个神经元的发放频率(率编码)和活跃传入纤维的数量(群体编码)。直到现在,单个尖峰的时间关系是否也传递有关触觉强度的信息仍未得到解决。我们使用皮肤电触觉刺激来研究在 1 秒刺激中固定数量的尖峰的时间结构如何影响强度感知。测试了跨越颤动和振动嗡嗡声范围的四个平均尖峰率(36 Hz、60 Hz;120 Hz、180 Hz),将尖峰分组为规则模式或间隔 3 ms 的 2-6 个尖峰的爆发。为了将假设的神经代码与感知联系起来,我们使用了量级估计的心理物理范式来评估 16 名人类参与者(年龄 20-45 岁;4 名女性)的感知强度。记录复合感觉神经动作电位以评估传入神经募集的任何刺激变化。将固定数量的尖峰时间结构成多个尖峰的周期性爆发会改变感知强度,其功能是爆发尖峰计数。在 36 Hz 下观察到最大的增加,其中六个尖峰的爆发被评为比规则间隔尖峰强 2.1 倍[95%置信区间(CI):1.9-2.3]。由于将尖峰时间结构成爆发对传入神经募集有一些负面影响,因此真实的增加可能更大。我们得出结论,即使对募集的传入神经数量进行归一化,通过改变传入神经放电的时间特征也可以调节感知强度。将固定数量的尖峰时间结构成时间爆发模式会根据爆发尖峰计数引起感知强度的渐变,强调了初级传入神经中尖峰时间在形成感知中的重要性。这为通过使用固定电荷量电脉冲简单地改变非特异性初级传入神经的尖峰时间来向神经接口用户传达一系列强度信息提供了新的策略,而无需改变刺激电流或平均脉冲频率。