College of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, People's Republic of China.
Institute of New Forestry Technology, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, People's Republic of China.
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03815-2.
Despite the importance of root hydraulics, there is little research on the in situ dynamic responses of embolism formation and embolism repair of roots distributed in different soil depths in response to different water regimes.
The vessel diameter, hydraulic conductivity, and vulnerability to cavitation were in the order of deep root > shallow root > branch. The midday PLC of shallow root was the highest in the dry season, while the midday PLC of deep root slightly higher than that of branch with no significant difference in the two seasons. The capacity of embolism repair of roots was significantly greater than that of branch both in dry season and wet season. The xylem pressure was in the order of deep roots > shallow root > branch, and it was negative in most of the time for the latter two in the dry season, but positive for both of the roots during the observation period in the wet season. The NSC and starch content in roots were significantly higher than those in branches, especially in the dry season. In contrast, roots had lower content of soluble sugar.
The relatively stable water condition in soil, especially in the deep layers, is favorable for the development of larger-diameter vessels in root xylem, however it cannot prevent the root from forming embolism. The mechanism of embolism repair may be different in different parts of plants. Deep roots mainly depend on root pressure to refill the embolized vessels, while branches mainly depend on starch hydrolysis to soluble sugars to do the work, with shallow roots shifted between the two mechanisms in different moisture regimes. There is theoretically an obvious trade-off between conducting efficiency and safety over deep roots, shallow roots and branches. But in natural conditions, roots do not necessarily suffer more severe embolism than branches, maybe due to their root pressure-driven embolism repair and relatively good water conditions.
尽管根水力学很重要,但对于分布在不同土壤深度的根在不同水分条件下形成和修复栓塞的原位动态响应,研究甚少。
导管直径、导水率和对空化的脆弱性顺序为:深根>浅根>树枝。旱季浅根的中午 PLC 最高,而深根的中午 PLC 略高于树枝,但两季间无显著差异。旱季和雨季,根的栓塞修复能力均显著大于树枝。木质部压力顺序为:深根>浅根>树枝,后两者在旱季的大部分时间为负值,但在雨季观察期间,两者均为正值。根的 NSC 和淀粉含量明显高于树枝,尤其是旱季。相比之下,根的可溶性糖含量较低。
土壤中相对稳定的水分条件,特别是在深层土壤中,有利于根木质部中大直径导管的发育,但这并不能防止根形成栓塞。栓塞修复的机制在植物的不同部位可能不同。深根主要依靠根压来填充栓塞的导管,而树枝主要依靠淀粉水解为可溶性糖来完成工作,浅根在不同水分条件下在这两种机制之间转换。从理论上讲,深根、浅根和树枝在导水效率和安全性之间存在明显的权衡。但在自然条件下,根不一定比树枝更容易遭受严重的栓塞,这可能是由于它们的根压驱动的栓塞修复和相对良好的水分条件。