Suppr超能文献

巴西一家三级急诊科的姑息治疗团队。

Palliative care team in a Brazilian tertiary emergency department.

作者信息

Lourençato Frederica Montanari, Miranda Carlos Henrique, de Carvalho Borges Marcos, Pazin-Filho Antonio

机构信息

Master in Healthcare Organizations, Hospital Estadual Serrana, São Paulo, Brazil.

Emergency Medicine Division, Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 16;15(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12245-022-00456-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the process of implementing a palliative care team (PCT) in a Brazilian public tertiary university hospital and compare this intervention as an active in-hospital search (strategy I) with the Emergency Department (strategy II).

METHODS

We described the development of a complex Palliative Care Team (PCT). We evaluated the following primary outcomes: hospital discharge, death (in-hospital and follow-up mortality) or transfer, and performance outcomes-Perception Index (difference in days between hospitalization and the evaluation by the PTC), follow-up index (difference in days between the PTC evaluation and the primary outcome), and the in-hospital stay.

RESULTS

We included 1203 patients-strategy I (587; 48.8%) and strategy II (616; 51.2%). In both strategies, male and elderly patients were prevalent. Most came from internal medicine I (39.3%) and II (57.9%), p <  0.01. General clinical conditions (40%) and Oncology I (27.7%) and II (32.4%) represented the majority of the population. Over 70% of all patients had PPS 10 and ECOG 4 above 85%. There was a reduction of patients identified in ICU from I (20.9%) to II (9.2%), p <  0.01, reduction in the ward from I (60.8%) to II (42.5%), p <  0.01 and a significant increase from I (18.2%) to II (48.2%) in the emergency department, p <  0.01. Regarding in-hospital mortality, 50% of patients remained alive within 35 days of hospitalization (strategy I), while for strategy II, 50% were alive within 20 days of hospitalization (p <  0.01). As for post-discharge mortality, in strategy II, 50% of patients died 10 days after hospital discharge, while in strategy I, this number was 40 days (p <  0.01). In the Cox multivariate regression model, adjusting for possible confounding factors, strategy II increased 30% the chance of death. The perception index decreased from 10.9 days to 9.1 days, there was no change in follow-up (12 days), and the duration of in-hospital stay dropped from 24.3 to 20.7 days, p <  0.01. The primary demand was the definition of prognosis (56.7%).

CONCLUSION

The present work showed that early intervention by an elaborate and complex PCT in the ED was associated with a faster perception of the need for palliative care and influenced a reduction in the length of hospital stay in a very dependent and compromised old population.

摘要

目的

描述在巴西一家公立三级大学医院实施姑息治疗团队(PCT)的过程,并将这种作为医院内主动筛查的干预措施(策略I)与急诊科的干预措施(策略II)进行比较。

方法

我们描述了一个复杂的姑息治疗团队(PCT)的发展情况。我们评估了以下主要结局:出院、死亡(院内及随访死亡率)或转院,以及绩效结局——感知指数(住院与PTC评估之间的天数差异)、随访指数(PTC评估与主要结局之间的天数差异)和住院时间。

结果

我们纳入了1203例患者——策略I(587例;48.8%)和策略II(616例;51.2%)。在两种策略中,男性和老年患者占多数。大多数患者来自内科I(39.3%)和内科II(57.9%),p<0.01。一般临床病症(40%)以及肿瘤内科I(27.7%)和肿瘤内科II(32.4%)占患者群体的大多数。所有患者中超过70%的患者PPS为10且ECOG 4高于85%。ICU中识别出的患者从策略I的20.9%降至策略II的9.2%,p<0.01,病房中的患者从策略I的60.8%降至策略II的42.5%,p<0.01,而急诊科的患者从策略I的18.2%显著增加至策略II的48.2%,p<0.01。关于院内死亡率,策略I中50%的患者在住院35天内仍存活,而策略II中,50%的患者在住院20天内仍存活(p<0.01)。至于出院后死亡率,在策略II中,50%的患者在出院后10天死亡,而在策略I中,这个数字是40天(p<0.01)。在Cox多变量回归模型中,对可能的混杂因素进行校正后,策略II使死亡几率增加了30%。感知指数从10.9天降至9.1天,随访时间无变化(12天),住院时间从24.3天降至20.7天,p<0.01。主要需求是预后判定(56.7%)。

结论

本研究表明,精心组建的复杂PCT在急诊科的早期干预与对姑息治疗需求的更快感知相关,并影响了非常依赖他人且健康状况不佳的老年人群住院时间的缩短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d05f/9479313/aaddc16c32d4/12245_2022_456_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验