Natoli Scientific-A Division of Natoli Engineering Company, Inc., Telford, PA 18969, USA.
Natoli Scientific-A Division of Natoli Engineering Company, Inc., Telford, PA 18969, USA.
Int J Pharm. 2022 Nov 5;627:122205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122205. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
A parameterization of compaction simulator generated dynamic compression profile with a few grams of powder provides important information about the material deformation and compact elasticity. The Heckel equation is by far the most popular choice among pharmaceutical scientists for such parametrization. A general approach of Heckel analysis uses pycnometric powder density (ρ) for relative density calculation. However, as 'in-die' tablet bulk density at applied compression pressure (ρ) becomes greater than or equal to the measured ρ, the general approach typically poses a negative porosity challenge at high compression pressure regions. It is only theoretically possible to have a tablet with zero or negative porosity. Negative porosity may be detected during 'in-die' compression analysis, but it will not exist after ejection of the tablet in practical aspect. Thus, the present work proposes a new approach to using pycnometric tablet density (ρ) in the relative density calculations of Heckel analysis. This ρ may be a better representation of actual tablet particle volume, as it is composed of non-accessible intra-particulate pores, which are broken under applied compression pressure. A new approach showed its immunity for Heckel high-pressure negative porosity. It enables the utilization of the compression and decompression phases of dynamic compression profiles to evaluate macroscopic compaction performance. The proposed approach was validated with a reported modified Heckel approach. The Heckel parameters computed with both methodologies for microcrystalline cellulose and lactose were not statistically different. However, a modified Heckel approach was unable to compute Heckel parameters of poorly compacting starch unlike the new approach. A modified Heckel approach became invalid during starch compaction at low compression pressures (below 400 MPa), where starch was forming weaker but still intact tablets. Certainly, a complete Heckel profiling with a new approach could save time and costs in an early development stage for designing and screening scientifically based lead prototype formulations.
一种用几克粉末生成动态压缩曲线的压缩模拟参数化方法提供了关于材料变形和压片弹性的重要信息。到目前为止,H eckel 方程是制药科学家在这种参数化中最常用的选择。H eckel 分析的一般方法是使用真密度(ρ)来计算相对密度。然而,由于在施加压缩压力时“模内”片剂的堆密度(ρ)大于或等于测量的ρ,一般方法在高压缩压力区域通常会出现负孔隙率的挑战。理论上片剂的孔隙率只能为零或负。在“模内”压缩分析过程中可能会检测到负孔隙率,但在实际方面,片剂弹出后不会存在。因此,本工作提出了一种在 Heckel 分析中使用真密度(ρ)进行相对密度计算的新方法。这种ρ可能更好地代表实际片剂颗粒体积,因为它由不可接近的颗粒内孔隙组成,这些孔隙在施加的压缩压力下会破裂。新方法显示出对 Heckel 高压负孔隙率的免疫性。它能够利用动态压缩曲线的压缩和解压阶段来评估宏观压缩性能。该方法已通过报道的改进 Heckel 方法进行了验证。用两种方法计算微晶纤维素和乳糖的 Heckel 参数在统计学上没有差异。然而,与新方法不同,改进的 Heckel 方法无法计算不易压缩的淀粉的 Heckel 参数。在淀粉的压缩压力较低(低于 400 MPa)时,改进的 Heckel 方法变得无效,此时淀粉形成较弱但仍完整的片剂。当然,在早期开发阶段,使用新方法进行完整的 Heckel 分析可以节省时间和成本,从而可以设计和筛选基于科学的先导原型配方。