Suppr超能文献

考察 FaCES 青少年 SBIRT 干预措施的有效性。

Examining the Effectiveness of the FaCES Adolescent SBIRT Intervention.

机构信息

Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.

Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2022 Oct;71(4S):S41-S48. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.04.013.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Facilitating Change for Excellence in SBIRT (FaCES) is a service package for adolescent primary care that was developed based on best practices and evidence, but was empirically untested. The aim of this study is to compare the FaCES intervention to treatment as usual (TAU) for rural adolescent primary care patients.

METHODS

In this modified cluster-randomized stepped wedge design, providers who completed at least 20 adolescent TAU visits received training in the FaCES package in random order. Adolescent patients (N = 1,226) waiting for appointments were continuously recruited into the study and completed a baseline assessment before their scheduled appointment and an on-line 3-month follow-up. Participants received either FaCES or TAU, depending on whether their provider had been trained in FaCES. Due to COVID-19 disruptions, only 14 of the 29 providers were trained before study recruitment activities ceased.

RESULTS

More than 80% of the sample indicated no prior use of tobacco, alcohol, or marijuana at study entry. The Arm × Time interaction failed to reach significance for the substance use outcomes considered. In the FaCES condition, the group with no prior use had an increased probability of substance use at 3-month follow-up, while the group reporting prior use had a decreased probability of use at follow-up. Participants who reported no use at baseline had an increased probability of use at follow-up, whether they received the FaCES intervention or TAU.

DISCUSSION

This study was unable to demonstrate the effectiveness of FaCES. Findings suggest some natural movement in substance use risk over time.

摘要

目的

促进卓越的 SBIRT(FaCES)是一个针对青少年初级保健的服务包,它是基于最佳实践和证据开发的,但尚未经过实证检验。本研究的目的是将 FaCES 干预与农村青少年初级保健的常规治疗(TAU)进行比较。

方法

在这项修改后的聚类随机阶梯式设计中,至少完成 20 次青少年 TAU 就诊的提供者将按照随机顺序接受 FaCES 包的培训。等候预约的青少年患者(N=1226)连续被招募到研究中,并在预约前完成基线评估和在线 3 个月随访。参与者接受 FaCES 或 TAU,具体取决于他们的提供者是否接受过 FaCES 培训。由于 COVID-19 的干扰,只有 29 名提供者中的 14 名在研究招募活动停止前接受了培训。

结果

超过 80%的样本在研究开始时表示没有使用过烟草、酒精或大麻。考虑的物质使用结果的 Arm×Time 交互作用未达到显著性。在 FaCES 条件下,没有使用史的组在 3 个月随访时物质使用的可能性增加,而有使用史的组在随访时物质使用的可能性降低。在基线时报告无使用史的参与者在随访时物质使用的可能性增加,无论他们接受 FaCES 干预还是 TAU。

讨论

本研究未能证明 FaCES 的有效性。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,物质使用风险会有一些自然的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验