Social and Administrative Pharmacy Graduate Program, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Oct;28(10):1100-1110. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.10.1100.
Despite the strong efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against the hepatitis C virus, many patients require a second regimen of DAA treatment. However, limited research exists to characterize rates of retreatment across different DAA agents or potential factors that may increase retreatment risk. To characterize patterns and predictors of DAA retreatment among a large, generalizable, commercially insured US population of patients. Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data source, this retrospective cohort study examined retreatment patterns among patients receiving DAAs between 2013 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics predictive of retreatment risk and to examine rates of retreatment in patients initiating different DAA treatments. Among 31,553 DAA users, a total of 1,017 (3.2%) required DAA retreatment. Among the 1,017 patients re-treated, 44 (4.3%) received a third treatment regimen and 2 patients received a fourth treatment regimen. The average total cost for a retreatment regimen was $109,683, with patient out-of-pocket costs totaling $1,287 Patients requiring retreatment had higher rates of hypertension (32.0% vs 26.7%; < 0.001), diabetes (16.9% vs 11.9%; < 0.001), coagulopathy (9.9% vs 4.5%; < 0.001), deficiency anemia (11.1% vs 7.4%; < 0.001), alcohol abuse (3.3% vs 2.3%; = 0.038), prior liver transplantation (3.4% vs 2.3%; = 0.024), and hepatocellular carcinoma (6.1% vs 1.9%; < 0.001) compared with patients not requiring retreatment. Although uncommon, some patients receiving DAAs require a second regimen of DAA treatment at substantial cost to both health plans and patients. These patients tend to have more comorbidities and markers of hepatic disease severity. Patients with high retreatment risk may benefit from careful monitoring for occurrences of retreatment.
尽管直接作用抗病毒药物 (DAA) 对丙型肝炎病毒具有强大的疗效,但仍有许多患者需要第二种 DAA 治疗方案。然而,目前关于不同 DAA 药物的再治疗率或可能增加再治疗风险的潜在因素的研究有限。
本研究旨在描述和预测在美国一个大型、可推广的商业保险患者群体中 DAA 再治疗的模式和预测因素。
使用 IBM MarketScan 商业索赔和就诊数据来源,本回顾性队列研究调查了 2013 年至 2019 年接受 DAA 治疗的患者的再治疗模式。使用描述性统计比较了预测再治疗风险的患者特征,并检查了接受不同 DAA 治疗的患者的再治疗率。
在 31553 名 DAA 用户中,共有 1017 名(3.2%)需要 DAA 再治疗。在 1017 名再治疗患者中,44 名(4.3%)接受了第三种治疗方案,2 名患者接受了第四种治疗方案。再治疗方案的平均总成本为 109683 美元,患者自付费用总计 1287 美元。需要再治疗的患者高血压发生率较高(32.0% vs 26.7%;<0.001),糖尿病(16.9% vs 11.9%;<0.001),凝血障碍(9.9% vs 4.5%;<0.001),贫血(11.1% vs 7.4%;<0.001),酒精滥用(3.3% vs 2.3%;=0.038),既往肝移植(3.4% vs 2.3%;=0.024)和肝细胞癌(6.1% vs 1.9%;<0.001)高于未接受再治疗的患者。
尽管不太常见,但一些接受 DAA 的患者需要第二种 DAA 治疗方案,这对健康计划和患者都造成了巨大的经济负担。这些患者往往有更多的合并症和肝疾病严重程度的标志物。高再治疗风险的患者可能受益于仔细监测再治疗的发生。