Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Radiol Med. 2022 Nov;127(11):1235-1244. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01558-6. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
This study aimed to explore the fracture line distribution and validate fracture classifications of Femoral head fractures (FHFs).
A total of 209 FHFs were reviewed retrospectively. Subjects were classified by associated injuries and commonly used fracture classifications (Pipkin, Brumback, and AO/OTA), and the universality degree of classifications was evaluated. The fracture line directions were determined in the coronal and axial CT planes. 3D mapping analysis of fracture lines was performed separately by each group. 3D maps were employed to analyze the discrimination degree of inter-subtype classifications and create a new classification. The subjects were subsequently reclassified. Correlations between classifications were analyzed to determine the matching degree of the three classifications.
The universality degrees were 98.6% (pipkin), 44.5% (Brumback), and 94.3% (AO/OTA). The cases of (100%) Brumback and (98.5%) AO/OTA can be classified by Pipkin. The mean angles of fracture lines to the coronal and axial axis of primary compressive trabeculae were 20.25° and 54.56°. The discrimination degrees of inter-subtype of classifications were 0 (Pipkin), 60% (Brumback), and 33% (AO/OTA). A new classification with three regions and five types was created on 3D maps. Pipkin and AO/OTA matched one region, while Brumback matched two regions.
There were three distributed fracture regions in FHFs that mismatched Pipkin, Brumback, and AO/OTA classifications. The new classification, based on morphometric features of FHFs, could compensate for the shortcomings of commonly used classifications, improving their applicability in treating FHFs.
本研究旨在探讨股骨头骨折(FHFs)的骨折线分布并验证骨折分类。
回顾性分析 209 例 FHF 患者。根据合并伤和常用骨折分类(Pipkin、Brumback 和 AO/OTA)对患者进行分类,并评估分类的普遍性程度。在冠状位和轴位 CT 平面上确定骨折线方向。对每组骨折线进行 3D 映射分析。3D 图谱分别用于分析亚型分类之间的区分度,并创建新的分类。随后对患者进行重新分类。分析分类之间的相关性,以确定三种分类的匹配程度。
Pipkin、Brumback 和 AO/OTA 的普遍性程度分别为 98.6%、44.5%和 94.3%。100%的 Brumback 和 98.5%的 AO/OTA 病例可通过 Pipkin 分类。骨折线与原发性压缩小梁冠状轴和轴向的平均角度分别为 20.25°和 54.56°。分类之间的亚型区分度为 0(Pipkin)、60%(Brumback)和 33%(AO/OTA)。在 3D 图谱上创建了一种具有三个区域和五个类型的新分类。Pipkin 和 AO/OTA 匹配一个区域,而 Brumback 匹配两个区域。
FHF 存在三个分布的骨折区域,与 Pipkin、Brumback 和 AO/OTA 分类不匹配。基于 FHF 形态特征的新分类可以弥补常用分类的不足,提高其在治疗 FHF 中的适用性。