Larronde-Larretche Mathieu, Jin Xue
Keon Research LLC, 2151 N Northlake Way b, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
School of Chemical Engineering, Biological Engineering & Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Membranes (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;12(9):892. doi: 10.3390/membranes12090892.
Microalgae have attracted great interest recently due to their potential for nutrients removal from wastewater, renewable biodiesel production and bioactive compounds extraction. However, one major challenge in microalgal bioremediation and the algal biofuel process is the high energy cost of separating microalgae from water. Our previous studies demonstrated that forward osmosis (FO) is a promising technology for microalgae harvesting and dewatering due to its low energy consumption and easy fouling control. In the present study, two FO module configurations (side-stream and submerged) were integrated with microalgae () photobioreactor (PBR) in order to evaluate the system performance, including nutrients removal, algae harvesting efficiency and membrane fouling. After 7 days of operation, both systems showed effective nutrients removal. A total of 92.9%, 100% and 98.7% of PO-P, NH-N and TN were removed in the PBR integrated with the submerged FO module, and 82%, 96% and 94.8% of PO-P, NH-N and TN were removed in the PBR integrated with the side-stream FO module. The better nutrients removal efficiency is attributed to the greater algae biomass in the submerged FO-PBR where in situ biomass dewatering was conducted. The side-stream FO module showed more severe permeate flux loss and biomass loss (less dewatering efficiency) due to algae deposition onto the membrane. This is likely caused by the higher initial water flux associated with the side-stream FO configuration, resulting in more foulants being transported to the membrane surface. However, the side-stream FO module showed better fouling mitigation by simple hydraulic flushing than the submerged FO module, which is not convenient for conducting cleaning without interrupting the PBR operation. Taken together, our results suggest that side-stream FO configuration may provide a viable way to integrate with PBR for a microalgae-based treatment. The present work provides novel insights into the efficient operation of a FO-PBR for more sustainable wastewater treatment and effective microalgae harvesting.
微藻因其具有从废水中去除营养物质、生产可再生生物柴油以及提取生物活性化合物的潜力,近年来引起了人们极大的兴趣。然而,微藻生物修复和藻类生物燃料过程中的一个主要挑战是将微藻从水中分离的高能量成本。我们之前的研究表明,正向渗透(FO)由于其低能耗和易于控制污染,是一种很有前景的微藻收获和脱水技术。在本研究中,将两种FO模块配置(侧流和浸没式)与微藻光生物反应器(PBR)集成,以评估系统性能,包括营养物质去除、藻类收获效率和膜污染情况。运行7天后,两个系统均显示出有效的营养物质去除效果。与浸没式FO模块集成的PBR中,PO-P、NH-N和TN的去除率分别为92.9%、100%和98.7%;与侧流FO模块集成的PBR中,PO-P、NH-N和TN的去除率分别为82%、96%和94.8%。更好的营养物质去除效率归因于浸没式FO-PBR中更大的藻类生物量,其中进行了原位生物量脱水。由于藻类沉积在膜上,侧流FO模块显示出更严重的渗透通量损失和生物量损失(脱水效率较低)。这可能是由与侧流FO配置相关的较高初始水通量导致的,从而使更多的污垢被输送到膜表面。然而,与浸没式FO模块相比,侧流FO模块通过简单的水力冲洗显示出更好的污垢缓解效果,而浸没式FO模块在不中断PBR运行的情况下进行清洗不太方便。综上所述,我们的结果表明,侧流FO配置可能为与PBR集成用于基于微藻的处理提供一种可行的方法。目前的工作为FO-PBR的高效运行提供了新的见解,以实现更可持续的废水处理和有效的微藻收获。