Suppr超能文献

用于评估胫骨应力性骨折的临床试验的前瞻性评估

Prospective Assessment of Clinical Tests Used to Evaluate Tibial Stress Fracture.

作者信息

Rosenthal Michael D, Rauh Mitchell J, Cowan James E

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 16;10(9):23259671221122356. doi: 10.1177/23259671221122356. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tibial stress fracture (SFx) is the most common SFx of the lower extremity. Presently, diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination techniques for tibial SFx remains suboptimal.

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic effectiveness of 5 clinical tests for tibial SFx individually versus a test item cluster.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with tibial pain (17 with bilateral symptoms) were assessed with 5 clinical examination tests (tibial fulcrum test, focal tenderness to palpation, heel percussion test, therapeutic ultrasound test, and 128-Hz tuning fork test) before they underwent diagnostic imaging (radionuclide bone scan). The application of the clinical tests was counterbalanced to minimize the likelihood of carryover effects. Patients provided a pain rating immediately before and after the application of each clinical test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of tibial SFx among the study participants was 52.2%. High levels of specificity were produced by the therapeutic ultrasound test (93.8%), tuning fork test (90.6%), and percussion test (90.6%). The fulcrum test had moderate to high specificity (84.4%). All tests demonstrated low levels of sensitivity, with the highest levels found for focal tenderness to palpation (48.6%) and fulcrum (45.7%). The fulcrum test provided the highest positive likelihood ratio (2.93), followed by the therapeutic ultrasound test (2.30). The fulcrum test had the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.64), with the focal tenderness to palpation and tuning fork tests having negative likelihood ratios >1.0. Combinations of these clinical tests did not improve the prediction of tibial SFx above that observed among the individual tests.

CONCLUSION

The clinical tests evaluated were generally highly specific, but all had low sensitivity. The fulcrum test provided the highest level of diagnostic accuracy; however, it was inadequate for definitive clinical management. Combining tests did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of tibial SFx.

摘要

背景

胫骨应力性骨折(SFx)是下肢最常见的应力性骨折。目前,胫骨应力性骨折临床检查技术的诊断准确性仍不理想。

目的

评估5项针对胫骨应力性骨折的临床检查单独应用与组合应用时的诊断效能。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据等级,3级。

方法

共有50例胫骨疼痛患者(17例为双侧症状)在接受诊断性影像学检查(放射性核素骨扫描)前接受了5项临床检查(胫骨支点试验、触诊局部压痛、足跟叩击试验、治疗性超声试验和128赫兹音叉试验)。临床检查的应用顺序经过平衡处理,以尽量减少延续效应的可能性。患者在每项临床检查应用前后立即进行疼痛评分。

结果

研究参与者中胫骨应力性骨折的患病率为52.2%。治疗性超声试验(93.8%)、音叉试验(90.6%)和叩击试验(90.6%)具有较高的特异性。支点试验具有中度至高度特异性(84.4%)。所有检查的敏感性均较低,触诊局部压痛(48.6%)和支点试验(45.7%)的敏感性最高。支点试验的阳性似然比最高(2.93),其次是治疗性超声试验(2.30)。支点试验的阴性似然比最低(0.64),触诊局部压痛和音叉试验的阴性似然比>1.0。这些临床检查的组合并没有比单项检查更好地预测胫骨应力性骨折。

结论

所评估的临床检查通常具有较高的特异性,但敏感性均较低。支点试验的诊断准确性最高;然而,它不足以用于明确的临床管理。联合检查并没有提高胫骨应力性骨折的诊断准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffe2/9486277/c96ac648b1df/10.1177_23259671221122356-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验