Ozdeniz Varan Esin, Gurvit Hakan
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Saglik Bilimleri, Hamidiye Institute of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey.
Behavioral Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine,İstanbul, Turkey.
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2023 Mar 1;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000320.
Studies have reported an increase in the incidence of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in patient groups treated with dopamine agonists (DAAs), especially in Parkinson disease (PD). However, very few studies have reported on ICDs in individuals with a prolactinoma who were treated with DAAs.
To see whether a DAA by itself causes ICDs in individuals with a prolactinoma by controlling the susceptibility to impulsivity by excluding individuals with other risk factors for ICDs.
We compared the performance of 31 individuals with a prolactinoma receiving DAA therapy (DAA+) on various behavioral scales and the Iowa gambling task (IGT), a neuropsychological instrument that measures risky decision-making, with the performance of 20 individuals with a prolactinoma who were not on DAA therapy (DAA-) and 30 healthy controls (HC).
There was no significant difference among the groups concerning performance on the Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale-V, Minnesota Impulse Disorders Interview, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11, or IGT. No correlation was found between the scores on these scales and the duration or dose of DAA in the DAA+ group. The incidence of ICDs was 25.8% in the DAA+ group, 15% in the DAA- group, and 16.7% in the HC. The differences among the groups did not reach statistical significance.
Individuals who are under treatment with low-dose, D 2 -selective DAAs for a prolactinoma do not face an increased risk for ICDs, especially when they are carefully screened for any psychiatric comorbidity that may also display impulsivity.
研究报告称,接受多巴胺激动剂(DAA)治疗的患者群体中,冲动控制障碍(ICD)的发病率有所上升,尤其是在帕金森病(PD)患者中。然而,关于接受DAA治疗的泌乳素瘤患者发生ICD的研究却非常少。
通过排除具有ICD其他风险因素的个体,以控制冲动易感性,来观察DAA本身是否会导致泌乳素瘤患者发生ICD。
我们比较了31例接受DAA治疗的泌乳素瘤患者(DAA+组)在各种行为量表和爱荷华赌博任务(IGT,一种测量风险决策的神经心理学工具)上的表现,与20例未接受DAA治疗的泌乳素瘤患者(DAA-组)和30名健康对照者(HC)的表现。
在祖克曼感觉寻求量表-V、明尼苏达冲动障碍访谈、巴拉特冲动性量表-11或IGT的表现上,各组之间没有显著差异。在DAA+组中,这些量表的得分与DAA的持续时间或剂量之间没有相关性。DAA+组中ICD的发病率为25.8%,DAA-组为15%,HC组为16.7%。各组之间的差异未达到统计学意义。
接受低剂量、D2选择性DAA治疗泌乳素瘤的个体,发生ICD的风险并未增加,尤其是在对可能也表现出冲动性的任何精神疾病合并症进行仔细筛查时。