Duke University School of Medicine (A.M., D.M.), Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Radiology (R.F., C.C., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, DUMC BOX 3808, 2301 Erwin Rd, Duke North, Room 1502, Durham, NC 27710.
Acad Radiol. 2023 Aug;30(8):1738-1745. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.08.027. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the virtualization of historically in-person radiology rotations for medical students. As students return to in-person clinical education, there is an opportunity to reevaluate teaching strategies and incorporate best practices from the pandemic. We describe our experience with the conversion of a four-week radiology clerkship from an in-person (IP) to remote learning (RL) to hybrid model (HM) and its impact on student performance and satisfaction.
Stratified by curriculum (Group 1 IP, Group 2 RL, Group 3 HM), student standardized final examination scores, final grades, lecture evaluation scores, and satisfaction scores were compared. Additional analysis was performed for Group 3 clinical divisions in which IP or RL models predominated.
A significant decrease in mean final exam score was noted in Group 2 (p < 0.0001). Average lecture rating decreased in Group 3 compared to Group 1 (p < 0.001). Group 3 students reported improved faculty (Group 1: 59, Group 2: 61, Group 3: 82; p < 0.001) and resident (Group 1: 76.5, Group 2: 68, Group 3: 90; p < 0.001) teaching effectiveness. Student-reported quantity and quality of formative feedback were also highest for Group 3 (Quantity; Group 1: 60.6, Group 2: 74, Group 3: 93; p < 0.001) (Quality; Group 1: 59.1, Group 2: 77, Group 3: 97; p < 0.001). Group 3 subanalysis demonstrated increased student-perceived usefulness of activities within IP divisions (p < 0.01) and a decrease for RL divisions (p < 0.05).
A hybrid curriculum resulted in improved student satisfaction and preserved student performance after an emergent conversion to remote learning.
新冠疫情促使医学生的传统放射学实习由线下转为线上。随着学生重返线下临床教育,我们有机会重新评估教学策略,并将疫情期间的最佳实践纳入其中。我们描述了将四周的放射科实习从线下(IP)转为远程学习(RL),再转为混合模式(HM)的经验,以及其对学生表现和满意度的影响。
按课程(第 1 组 IP、第 2 组 RL、第 3 组 HM)分层,比较学生标准化期末考试成绩、最终成绩、讲座评估得分和满意度得分。对主要采用 IP 或 RL 模式的第 3 组临床分部进行了额外分析。
第 2 组(p<0.0001)的平均期末考试成绩显著下降。与第 1 组相比,第 3 组的平均讲座评分降低(p<0.001)。第 3 组的学生报告说,教师(第 1 组:59、第 2 组:61、第 3 组:82;p<0.001)和住院医师(第 1 组:76.5、第 2 组:68、第 3 组:90;p<0.001)的教学效果有所提高。第 3 组学生报告的形成性反馈的数量和质量也是最高的(数量;第 1 组:60.6、第 2 组:74、第 3 组:93;p<0.001)(质量;第 1 组:59.1、第 2 组:77、第 3 组:97;p<0.001)。第 3 组的子分析表明,学生对 IP 分部活动的感知有用性增加(p<0.01),而 RL 分部的感知有用性下降(p<0.05)。
在紧急转为远程学习后,混合课程提高了学生的满意度,保持了学生的表现。