Suppr超能文献

淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌中Oncotype DX复发评分检测的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Berdunov Vladislav, Millen Steve, Paramore Andrew, Griffin Jane, Reynia Sarah, Fryer Nina, Brown Rebecca, Longworth Louise

机构信息

PHMR Ltd, London, UK.

Exact Sciences, London, UK.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Sep 19;14:619-633. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S360049. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer. A model-based economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay against the use of clinical risk tools alone based on the latest evidence from prospective studies.

METHODS

The proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy conditional on their RS result was obtained from retrospective data from the Clalit registry. The probability of distant recurrence with endocrine and chemo-endocrine therapy conditional on RS result was obtained from TAILORx and NSABP B-20 trials. The cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay compared to using clinical risk tools alone was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

The 21-gene assay was more effective (0.17 more quality-adjusted life years) at a lower cost (-£519) over a lifetime compared to clinical risk alone. The model results were sensitive to assumptions around the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in the high RS result subgroup. Other assumptions underpinning the model, such as the proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy in the low and mid-range RS result subgroups and long-term distant recurrence probabilities, had a smaller impact on the results.

CONCLUSION

The analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay is sensitive to assumptions for chemotherapy sparing for patients with RS 0-25 whose outcomes with endocrine therapy are no worse compared to chemotherapy-assigned patients, and a chemotherapy benefit in the RS 26-100 group. Future studies need to incorporate a wider set of tumour profiling tests other than the 21-gene assay to allow a direct comparison of their cost-effectiveness.

摘要

背景

21基因检测(Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分检测)是一种经过验证的多基因检测方法,可得出复发评分结果(RS),用于指导人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)、激素受体阳性(HR+)早期浸润性乳腺癌辅助化疗的使用决策。一项基于模型的经济学评估根据前瞻性研究的最新证据,估计了21基因检测相对于仅使用临床风险工具的成本效益。

方法

根据克拉利特登记处的回顾性数据,得出根据RS结果接受化疗的患者比例。根据TAILORx和NSABP B-20试验,得出根据RS结果接受内分泌和化疗-内分泌治疗的远处复发概率。在终身范围内,以每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本来估计21基因检测与仅使用临床风险工具相比的成本效益。

结果

与仅使用临床风险相比,21基因检测在终身范围内更有效(多0.17个质量调整生命年)且成本更低(低519英镑)。模型结果对高RS结果亚组中化疗获益程度的假设敏感。模型的其他假设,如低和中范围RS结果亚组中接受化疗的患者比例以及长期远处复发概率,对结果的影响较小。

结论

分析表明,21基因检测的成本效益对以下假设敏感:对于RS为0 - 25且内分泌治疗结果不比接受化疗的患者差的患者,减少化疗;以及RS为26 - 100组中的化疗获益。未来的研究需要纳入除21基因检测之外更广泛的肿瘤分析检测,以便直接比较它们的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a0/9505370/ea6d8f03305d/CEOR-14-619-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验