Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像引导下的靶向融合活检与经直肠超声引导下的活检——在最终的根治性前列腺切除标本中 ISUP 评分升级风险的比较研究。

Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon.

Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Sep 26;94(3):278-284. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.3.278.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to com-pare the risk of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score upgrading between magnetic resonance imaging targeted fusion biopsy (MRI-TB) and tran-srectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-B) in the final radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen pathological report.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single center study included 51 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosed with MRI-TB and 83 patients diagnosed with TRUS-B between October/2019 and July/2021. We compared the rates of ISUP score upgrading between both groups after robotic-assisted radi-cal prostatectomy (RARP) and the specific transition of each ISUP score based on biopsy modality. The rate of ISUP score concordance and downgrading were also assessed. To define the intra and interobserver concordance for each ISUP score in biopsy and RP specimen for each biopsy modality, the Cohen's Kappa coefficient was calculated. ISUP scores and biopsy modal-ity were selected for multivariate analysis and a logistic regres-sion model was built to provide independent risk factors of ISUP score upgrading.

RESULTS

The difference of the rate of upgrading between MRI-TB group and TRUS-B group was statistically significant (p = 0.007) with 42.2% of patients of TRUS-B group experiencing an upgrade in their ISUP score while only 19.6% in MRI-TB group. Concordance and downgrading rates did not statistically differ between the two groups. Strength of concordance using Cohen's Kappa coefficient was fair in both groups but higher in MRI-TB group (TRUS-B group k = 0.230; p < 0.001; concordance: 47%vs. MRI/TB group k = 0.438; p < 0.001; concordance: 62.7%). Biopsy modality and ISUP 1 on biopsy were independent predic-tors of ISUP upgrading after RP.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-TB is highly accurate with lower risk of PCa upgrading after RP than TRUS-B. Patients with ISUP 1 on biopsy have greater susceptibility to upgrading their ISUP score.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较磁共振成像靶向融合活检(MRI-TB)与经直肠超声引导活检(TRUS-B)在最终根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本病理报告中的国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)评分升级风险。

材料和方法

这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了 2019 年 10 月至 2021 年 7 月期间经 MRI-TB 诊断为前列腺癌(PCa)的 51 例患者和经 TRUS-B 诊断为 83 例患者。我们比较了两组患者在接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后 ISUP 评分升级的比率,并根据活检方式比较了每个 ISUP 评分的具体转变。还评估了 ISUP 评分的一致性和降级率。为了定义两种活检方式下活检和 RP 标本中每个 ISUP 评分的观察者内和观察者间一致性,计算了 Cohen's Kappa 系数。选择 ISUP 评分和活检方式进行多变量分析,并建立逻辑回归模型以提供 ISUP 评分升级的独立危险因素。

结果

MRI-TB 组和 TRUS-B 组的升级率差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.007),TRUS-B 组 42.2%的患者 ISUP 评分升级,而 MRI-TB 组仅为 19.6%。两组之间的一致性和降级率无统计学差异。Cohen's Kappa 系数显示两组的一致性强度为中度,但 MRI-TB 组更高(TRUS-B 组 k = 0.230;p < 0.001;一致性:47%;MRI/TB 组 k = 0.438;p < 0.001;一致性:62.7%)。活检方式和活检时的 ISUP 1 是 RP 后 ISUP 升级的独立预测因素。

结论

MRI-TB 具有较高的准确性,RP 后 PCa 升级的风险低于 TRUS-B。活检时 ISUP 1 的患者更有可能升级其 ISUP 评分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验