OBJECTIVES

To compare the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality and effective dose between low-dose scanning and standard manufacturer-recommended protocols among different CBCT units.

METHODS

Three human-equivalent phantoms were scanned using the ultra-low-dose (ULD), low dose (LD), and standard dose (STD) modes of ProMax 3D Mid (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and Orthophos SL (Sirona, Bensheim, German) for the CBCT images. The quality of the dental anatomical images was assessed by four experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale. OnDemand3D (Cybermed Co., Seoul, Korea) was used as the third-party software for viewing. The percentage of absolute agreement was calculated to determine intra- and interrater agreements among the observers. The effective doses for all CBCT scanning protocols were also calculated.

RESULTS

The STD protocol yielded a higher image quality than did the ULD and LD protocols in both ProMax 3D Mid and Orthophos SL. The ULD and LD protocols demonstrated an "acceptable-to-good" sense of visual perception of the CBCT images. The visibility scores significantly differed between the ULD and LD and the STD protocols in ProMax 3D Mid and Orthophos SL, except for the 120-kVp setting in ProMax 3D Mid. The average intra- and interrater agreement scores ranged from 0.63 to 0.89 and from 0.44 to 0.76, respectively. The ULD and LD protocols reduced the radiation dose sixfold compared with the STD protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

High-tube-voltage protocols could remarkably reduce the imaging dose without degrading the image quality. Specifically, ULD and LD CBCT protocols may be adopted as routine practice for diagnosis and treatment planning.