Anesthesia Operation Center, Chengdu Seventh People's Hospital, China.
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;2022:3603949. doi: 10.1155/2022/3603949. eCollection 2022.
Surgical reduction is the leading approach to patients with lower extremity fractures. The options of anesthetic drugs during surgery are of great significance to postoperative recovery of patients. There is no consensus on the optimum anesthesia method for patients undergoing lower extremity fracture surgery. Our study is aimed at investigating the impacts of nerve block combined with general anesthesia on perioperative outcomes of the patients.
In this retrospective study, 48 patients experienced general anesthesia only, and 42 patients received never block combined with general anesthesia. The perioperative hemodynamics was recorded, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation of blood (SpO2), and heart rate (HR). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were carried out to evaluate postoperative pain and cognitive status. Furthermore, adverse reactions and recovery condition were observed between the patients receiving different anesthesia methods.
At 15 minutes and 30 minutes after anesthesia, as well as 5 minutes after surgery, significant lower MAP was observed in the patients treated with general anesthesia (83.04 ± 8.661, 79.17 ± 9.427, 86.58 ± 8.913) compared to those receiving never block combined with general anesthesia (90.43 ± 4.618, 88.74 ± 6.224, 92.21 ± 4.015) ( < 0.05), and compared with general anesthesia group (68.5 ± 7.05, 69.63 ± 7.956, 72.75 ± 8.446), the combined anesthesia group (73.52 ± 9.451, 74.17 ± 10.13, 77.62 ± 9.768) showed obvious higher HR ( < 0.05). No significant difference in SpO was found between the two groups at multiple time points ( > 0.05). As for the score of VAS and MoCA, remarkably lower VAS and higher MoCA at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery were presented in the combined anesthesia group compared to general anesthesia group ( < 0.05). At 24 h after surgery, the two groups showed normal cognitive function (26.33 ± 0.7244 vs. 28.55 ± 0.7392). Incidence of nausea and vomiting in the combined anesthesia group was lower than that of the general anesthesia group ( < 0.05). The time to out-of-bed activity and hospital stay were shorter in the combined anesthesia group compared with general anesthesia ( < 0.05).
The application of never block combined with general anesthesia contributed to the stability of hemodynamics, alleviation of postoperative pain and cognitive impairment, along with decrease in adverse reactions and hospital stay in the patients with lower extremity fractures.
手术复位是治疗下肢骨折患者的主要方法。手术中麻醉药物的选择对患者术后恢复具有重要意义。对于行下肢骨折手术的患者,哪种麻醉方法最佳尚未达成共识。我们的研究旨在探讨神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对患者围手术期结局的影响。
在这项回顾性研究中,48 例患者仅接受全身麻醉,42 例患者接受神经阻滞联合全身麻醉。记录围手术期的血流动力学,包括平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)和心率(HR)。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评估术后疼痛和认知状态。此外,观察接受不同麻醉方法的患者的不良反应和恢复情况。
麻醉后 15 分钟、30 分钟和手术 5 分钟时,全身麻醉组患者的 MAP 明显低于仅接受全身麻醉的患者(83.04 ± 8.661、79.17 ± 9.427、86.58 ± 8.913)(<0.05),与全身麻醉组(68.5 ± 7.05、69.63 ± 7.956、72.75 ± 8.446)相比,联合麻醉组(73.52 ± 9.451、74.17 ± 10.13、77.62 ± 9.768)的 HR 明显更高(<0.05)。两组在多个时间点的 SpO2 无显著差异(>0.05)。VAS 和 MoCA 评分方面,联合麻醉组术后 6、12 和 24 小时的 VAS 评分明显较低,MoCA 评分明显较高(<0.05)。术后 24 小时,两组患者认知功能均正常(26.33 ± 0.7244 vs. 28.55 ± 0.7392)。联合麻醉组恶心呕吐的发生率低于全身麻醉组(<0.05)。与全身麻醉组相比,联合麻醉组下床活动时间和住院时间更短(<0.05)。
神经阻滞联合全身麻醉可稳定血流动力学,减轻术后疼痛和认知障碍,减少不良反应和住院时间,有利于下肢骨折患者的康复。