Shin John I, Leggett Andrew R, Berg Ari R, Kaushal Neil K, Vives Michael J
Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers University New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D1610, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Spine Deform. 2023 Mar;11(2):313-318. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00585-7. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
To assess the efficacy and safety of intrawound antibiotics in posterior fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
The NSQIP-Pediatric databases 2016-2018 were utilized. Patients 10 years of age or older with AIS who underwent posterior fusion were selected and divided into two cohorts based on the receipt of intrawound antibiotics. Patient characteristics and complications were compared. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the efficacy and safety of intrawound antibiotics.
A total of 4203 patients received intrawound antibiotics while 879 patients did not. The intrawound antibiotic group had longer constructs, higher blood loss, and longer operative times, factors historically associated with higher infection rates. Those that received intrawound antibiotics had SSI rate of 0.69%, while its counterpart had 0.57% (p = 0.689). The reoperation rates were 1.12% and 1.25% (p = 0.735), for those with and without intrawound antibiotics, respectively. In multivariate analyses, intrawound antibiotics use was not found to be a significant predictor for SSI, any complications, reoperation and readmission.
The current study represents the largest AIS surgery cohort studied to evaluate the efficacy of intrawound antibiotics. Our analysis failed to demonstrate association between the use of intrawound antibiotics and reduction in SSI. While other studies have reported seroma, wound dehiscence and renal failure with the practice, we did not observe an increased rate of such complications. This study highlights the difficulty of understanding the role for individual infection prevention measures in current surgical settings, where the SSI rate for the control group was substantially lower than 1%.
评估伤口内使用抗生素在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)后路融合手术中的疗效和安全性。
利用2016 - 2018年NSQIP - 儿科数据库。选择年龄在10岁及以上接受后路融合手术的AIS患者,并根据是否接受伤口内抗生素治疗分为两个队列。比较患者特征和并发症。进行多变量分析以确定伤口内抗生素的疗效和安全性。
共有4203例患者接受了伤口内抗生素治疗,而879例患者未接受。伤口内抗生素治疗组的内固定节段更长、失血量更多、手术时间更长,这些因素在历史上与更高的感染率相关。接受伤口内抗生素治疗的患者手术部位感染率为0.69%,而未接受的患者为0.57%(p = 0.689)。接受和未接受伤口内抗生素治疗的患者再次手术率分别为1.12%和1.25%(p = 0.735)。在多变量分析中,未发现使用伤口内抗生素是手术部位感染、任何并发症、再次手术和再次入院的显著预测因素。
本研究是评估伤口内抗生素疗效的最大规模AIS手术队列研究。我们的分析未能证明伤口内使用抗生素与手术部位感染减少之间存在关联。虽然其他研究报告了这种做法会导致血清肿、伤口裂开和肾衰竭,但我们并未观察到此类并发症发生率增加。本研究凸显了在当前手术环境中理解个体感染预防措施作用的困难,其中对照组的手术部位感染率显著低于1%。