Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Salzburger Landeskliniken, Salzburg, Austria.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 30;17(9):e0275585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275585. eCollection 2022.
Visual input is crucial for understanding speech under noisy conditions, but there are hardly any tools to assess the individual ability to lipread. With this study, we wanted to (1) investigate how linguistic characteristics of language on the one hand and hearing impairment on the other hand have an impact on lipreading abilities and (2) provide a tool to assess lipreading abilities for German speakers. 170 participants (22 prelingually deaf) completed the online assessment, which consisted of a subjective hearing impairment scale and silent videos in which different item categories (numbers, words, and sentences) were spoken. The task for our participants was to recognize the spoken stimuli just by visual inspection. We used different versions of one test and investigated the impact of item categories, word frequency in the spoken language, articulation, sentence frequency in the spoken language, sentence length, and differences between speakers on the recognition score. We found an effect of item categories, articulation, sentence frequency, and sentence length on the recognition score. With respect to hearing impairment we found that higher subjective hearing impairment is associated with higher test score. We did not find any evidence that prelingually deaf individuals show enhanced lipreading skills over people with postlingual acquired hearing impairment. However, we see an interaction with education only in the prelingual deaf, but not in the population with postlingual acquired hearing loss. This points to the fact that there are different factors contributing to enhanced lipreading abilities depending on the onset of hearing impairment (prelingual vs. postlingual). Overall, lipreading skills vary strongly in the general population independent of hearing impairment. Based on our findings we constructed a new and efficient lipreading assessment tool (SaLT) that can be used to test behavioral lipreading abilities in the German speaking population.
视觉输入对于在嘈杂环境下理解言语至关重要,但几乎没有任何工具可以评估个体的唇读能力。本研究旨在:(1) 一方面调查语言的语言学特征,另一方面调查听力障碍如何影响唇读能力;(2) 为德语使用者提供一种评估唇读能力的工具。170 名参与者(22 名先天性聋)完成了在线评估,该评估包括主观听力障碍量表和无声视频,其中包含不同的项目类别(数字、单词和句子)。参与者的任务是仅通过视觉检查识别口语刺激。我们使用了一个测试的不同版本,并研究了项目类别、口语中单词的频率、发音、口语中句子的频率、句子长度以及说话者之间的差异对识别分数的影响。我们发现项目类别、发音、句子频率和句子长度对识别分数有影响。关于听力障碍,我们发现主观听力障碍程度越高,测试得分越高。我们没有发现任何证据表明先天性聋人比后天获得性听力障碍的人具有更强的唇读技能。然而,我们仅在先天性聋人中观察到与教育有关的相互作用,而在后天获得性听力损失人群中则没有。这表明,增强唇读能力的因素因听力障碍的发生时间(先天性与后天性)而异。总体而言,唇读能力在普通人群中差异很大,与听力障碍无关。基于我们的发现,我们构建了一种新的、有效的唇读评估工具(SaLT),可用于测试德语使用者的行为唇读能力。