Suppr超能文献

Lhermitte-Duclos 病的多种影像学表现。

Diverse imaging findings of Lhermitte-Duclos disease.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Yantai Laiyang Central Hospital, Yantai, China.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2023 Jan;78(1):33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.08.134. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the diverse clinical and imaging features of Lhermitte-Duclos disease (LDD) and its subgroup comparison.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data from 21 patients with LDD were collected, including eight patients with LDD without other tumours and 13 LDD with other tumours. Redefined diagnostic criteria are used to evaluate Cowden Syndrome. Imaging indicators were analysed retrospectively to extract typical and atypical features. Imaging findings and preoperative diagnostic accuracy were compared between the subgroups.

RESULTS

None of these patients met the redefined diagnostic criteria. The typical "tiger stripe sign" was seen in most LDD lesions (13/29, 61.9%), with lower density (29.66 ± 2.51 versus 37.81 ± 2.76 HU, p<0.001) and higher apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (1.04 ± 0.05 × 10 versus 0.74 ± 0.03 × 10 mm/s, p<0.001) than that of the normal cerebellum. Atypically, some lesions showed abnormal vessels (8/21, 38.1%), intratumoural calcification (3/21, 14.29%), intratumoural haemorrhage (4/21, 19.05%), peritumoural oedema (6/21, 28.57%), and heterogeneous enhancement (5/21, 23.81%). The typical "tiger stripe sign" was more common in LDD with other tumours (84.62% versus 25%, p=0.018). Although LDD without other tumours was more common with abnormal vessels (75% versus 15.38%, p=0.018), intratumoural calcification (37.5% versus 0, p=0.042), intratumoural haemorrhage (50% versus 0, p=0.012), peritumoural oedema (62.5% versus 7.69%, p=0.014) and heterogeneous enhancement (50% versus 7.69%, p=0.047). Preoperative diagnostic accuracy was higher in LDD with other tumours than LDD without other tumours (76.92% versus 25%, p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

The "tiger stripe sign" of LDD is characteristic, but not unique. With or without other tumours, it may be associated with the imaging diversity. Combining typical and atypical signs can improve the imaging assessment of LDD.

摘要

目的

评估 Lhermitte-Duclos 病(LDD)的不同临床和影像学特征及其亚组比较。

材料与方法

收集了 21 例 LDD 患者的临床资料,其中 8 例无其他肿瘤的 LDD 患者和 13 例有其他肿瘤的 LDD 患者。使用重新定义的诊断标准评估考登综合征。回顾性分析影像学指标,提取典型和非典型特征。比较亚组之间的影像学表现和术前诊断准确性。

结果

这些患者均不符合重新定义的诊断标准。大多数 LDD 病变(13/29,61.9%)可见典型的“虎纹征”,密度较低(29.66±2.51 比 37.81±2.76 HU,p<0.001),表观扩散系数(ADC)值较高(1.04±0.05×10 比 0.74±0.03×10 mm/s,p<0.001)。非典型表现为部分病变显示异常血管(8/21,38.1%)、瘤内钙化(3/21,14.29%)、瘤内出血(4/21,19.05%)、瘤周水肿(6/21,28.57%)和不均匀强化(5/21,23.81%)。有其他肿瘤的 LDD 更常见典型的“虎纹征”(84.62%比 25%,p=0.018)。尽管无其他肿瘤的 LDD 更常见异常血管(75%比 15.38%,p=0.018)、瘤内钙化(37.5%比 0,p=0.042)、瘤内出血(50%比 0,p=0.012)、瘤周水肿(62.5%比 7.69%,p=0.014)和不均匀强化(50%比 7.69%,p=0.047)。有其他肿瘤的 LDD 术前诊断准确性高于无其他肿瘤的 LDD(76.92%比 25%,p=0.032)。

结论

LDD 的“虎纹征”具有特征性,但不具有特异性。有或无其他肿瘤时,它可能与影像学多样性有关。结合典型和非典型征象可提高对 LDD 的影像学评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验